Re: BREAKING: COULD THIS MEAN THERE WAS A UNION? MUNA"S DELEGATION TO THE UN IN 1961

Dear Southern Cameroonians (Ambazonians)

I have read the very elegant speech by the Hon. S.T. Muna on Tuesday
17th October, 1961 at the General Assembly of the United Nations. (I
suspect it was drafted by Prof.Bernard Nsokika Fonlon).

It is not what any particular delegate states on the floor of the
General Assembly that matters. In the end, it is the recorded
Resolution adopted by the majority of members of the General Assembly
that becomes the decision of the Assembly.

The fact that the Hon ST Muna delivered a brilliant speech on 17th
Oct. 1961 is very nice, but the UN General Assembly Resolution 1608
records the official consensus of the Members on the question of the
date of independence of Southern Cameroons, which was violently
opposed by LRC. That Resolution, by a majority of members, fixed 1
Oct 1961 as the date of independence of Southern Cameroons. The
Resolution also strongly advised the holding of a tripartite
conference between the British Administering Authority, the Govt of
Southern Cameroons and the Govt of La Republique du Cameroun, to draw
up a Union Agreement, reflecting the understandings and undertakings
of the parties, it being understood that Southern Cameroons was first
to be independent before joining La Republique du Cameroun in a
Federation of 2 states equal in status. It was not necessary to
reproduce the provisions of the UN Charter Art 102, as constitutional
provisions are deemed to apply to all the dealings of member states of
the UN.

Independence by Joining has been defined by UN General Assembly Res.
1541(XV) passed on 15 Dec. 1960, which stipulated that Independence by
Joining could only be either by way of association or by integration.
The logical inference is that the the methodology for joining having
been established by a UN General Assembly Res. of 15th Dec. 1960,
which had not been amended, it applied equally to the joining
conversations of April 1961, unless otherwise stated.

Everybody agrees that the alleged so-called LRC Law 24/61 of 1st Sept
1961 violated Art. 102 of the UN Charter and, in the absence of a
written Agreement between the parties, was unconstitutional and
illegal. Any conclusions founded on the violation of a constitutional
provision suffer from the cancerous base of an illegality, which
cannot be repaired, because the base is illegal.

The so-called Joining Law No. 24/61 unilaterally passed by the
Parliament of La Republique du Cameroun and promulgated by its
President on 1 Sept 1961 could have no legal application to the
territory of Southern Cameroons which was still a UN trust territory
until midnight of 30 Sept 1961. LRC Law No. 24/61 creating a
"Federation" with Southern Cameroons, without there being a union
agreement with that territory, collapses under the weight of UN
Charter Art. 103.

What Southern Cameroons (Ambazonia) live with now is an illegal
co-habitation with LRC.
There has been no legitimate union that complies with international
law per the UN Charter Art 102..
UN General Assembly Res. 1608 of 21 Apr 1961 fixed the date of 1st Oct
1961 as the date of the Independence of Southern Cameroons.
The independence of Southern Cameroons has been suppressed by La
Republique du Cameroun by Annexing the territory and converting it
into two regions within its own country.

CONCLUSION

If a majority of Southern Cameroonians can tender proof to the UN that
their independence has been suppressed, and their territory illegally
annexed, their plea to exercise their fundamental and unquestionable
human right of self-determination will be granted.

That is the way forward, for the last straw has been the
nationalization of the prime Jewel of Southern Cameroons, the CDC,
which is sitting on Bakweri prime land on lease to the CDC, without
reference to the indigenous Bakweri landowners and without
compensation!

Hello Southern Cameroonians (Ambazonians), seeking a solution in small
camps has yielded no result. We must, as a PEOPLE, unite, and seek
international support to assert our unquestionable fundamental human
right of self-determination. The time is now!

Oma nanu

Mola


\







On 7/4/16, 'M A N' via ambasbay <ambasbay@googlegroups.com> wrote:
> Dear Acham
> There are more in stock for us. When one goes through records of; -United
> Nations (UN) i.e Fourth Committee, Sixth Committee, General Assembly)
> -International Law Commission (ILC)-International Court of Justice; one will
> notice that these highest international law making bodies had talked of a
> Federation Republic of the Cameroons here and there in their records but we
> are the very people who are refusing to find out why? All we have been doing
> is looking at personality politics and not standing in principles.
> We are at a stage that every one is talking about action but less than 0.5%
> of us really know how we got into the problem in the first place. If we
> truly know how we entered the problem then it will be easy to find a way
> out. If we know, it will help us know who exactly is to be targeted are why.
> I here confess to our people that 99.5% do not really know how we got to
> where we find ourselves. The 0.5% that know are never taken seriously or
> being heard because we do or like personality politics and not politics
> based on principles first before personality.
> From the volumes of records on the Trust Territory of British Cameroons, if
> we know what part the our leaders (Foncha, Muna and Endeley) did during the
> decolonization process of our country we will know how to focus are fight.
> Some will say Endeley's predict about joining with Cameroun was to be bad
> and it has come to pass --yet we failed to find out how Endeley proposed
> alternative of joining but Nigeria would have been good. Some will say Muna
> said our independence is on the ground, it is only for us to bend down and
> pick. He did not tell us that he told the whole world through the General
> Assembly on the 17 October 1961 (just 16 days after 1 October 1961) that a
> perfect Federation Republic was in place. Some will say that Foncha cried
> during AAC I conference in Buea but he did not tell us that he had a secret
> deal with Ahidjo not to strictly implement the Plebiscite Pact references in
> 1608XV paragraph (5) in return of his political post of vice president in
> the fake Federal Republic Cameroon. The British knew this and stayed
> silence.
>
> These our leaders did not tell us that, they did not demand for complete
> independence for the Southern Cameroons --their parties being the first and
> second majority parties in Southern Cameroons at the time. The voices of
> real nationalist like Kale, Manga and Traditional rulers party (Fons) at the
> Manfe Conference that were in the minority but were for total independence
> for southern Cameroons on its own were never stated at the UN when the
> question of our future was to be considered. It is on records Foncha and
> Endeley got the Southern Cameroons parliament to give them powers to speak
> for people Southern Cameroons. It is records that only their contrary
> parties ideas were tabled at the UN for consideration. The complete
> independent voice was never mention at the UN when the political leaders of
> the Southern Cameroons went to the UN after Manfe conference.
> One important fact we must always is the Trusteeship Agreement and UN
> Article 76b made mentioned very clearly that the termination of the
> Trusteeship will be according to the  wishes of the people. All through the
> process, the wishes of our people that was handed to Foncha and Endeley was
> above the United Nations and United Kingdom. So, what ever our wishes was to
> be the UN and Britain was to go by it. Our leaders did not have voice as to
> what our future would be for consideration. Their differences as what we
> want became so messy that foreign countries were worried. It was are leaders
> that were so desperate to go with Nigeria or Cameroun. Even at a time,
> Cameroun made it clear to the UN that it will never allow any constitutional
> experts to enter her country to implement paragraph 5 of 1608 XV because the
> UN has no legal right to dictate to a sovereign nation. Cameroun voted
> against 1608XV, yet our people were till bend to join Cameroun as if we were
> cursed. It was the wishes of people that British and the UN followed. From
> UN records it is legally clear that after vote of Resolution 1608XV (64
> infavor, 23 against and 10 abstention) the UN main objective of Article 76b
> INDEPENDENCE was achieved for the British Cameroons in accordance to to the
> wishes of the people. It is clearly seen from UN records that the
> implementation of paragraph 5 of 1608XV (Terms of the Plebiscite Pact which
> was Federation) was considered to be internal affairs of two sovereign
> independent states. Take note that the question of Northern Cameroons is not
> touch here, because they too have their own way. The records are very clear.
>
>
> After United Republic of Cameroon law 84/01 was passed, these our indirectly
> ganged up with Cameroun (Paul Biyia) against the Ambazonian Restoration
> Council under Gorji Dinka's leadership when Dr. Fonlong handed to over.
> Instead of looking at principles that a person stands for first, we are are
> looking but for personality. Our people have been and are still the very
> ones that are keeping us under occupation because, they and their families,
> are the ones benefiting from it. Are we sure the transfer of the CDC
> headquarter to Yaounde is without the knowledge of our people?
>
> I wish we all take some time to read these two international legal
> interpretation on how the British Cameroons termination of the trusteeship
> is viewed within international law. We do not needs to seek for treaty of
> union but just to tell the UN that the Federation Republic of Cameroon end
> in 1984 period.
>
> 1 -ILC Legal Analysis on UN Article 76b -Future of the Cameroons under
> British Administration
> 2 -ILC Legal Analysis of UN Article 76b on Termination of the Trusteeship
> Agreement of British Cameroons
> 3 -Muna at the UN General Assembly meeting 17 days after 1 October 1961
> Taking action based on perfect understanding of legality is the best way.
> The two must go together -- but then are we there yet?
> MANAmbazonianDownUnder
>
> From: Julius Acham <achamj07@gmail.com>
> To: ambasbay <ambasbay@googlegroups.com>
> Sent: Monday, 4 July 2016, 12:31
> Subject: BREAKING: COULD THIS MEAN THERE WAS A UNION? MUNA"S DELEGATION TO
> THE UN IN 1961
>
> Muna's Speech at the UN GA Acknowledging Unification & Independence of The
> Cameroons
> http://ambazonia.org/media/pdfs/Muna%27s%20Speech%20at%20the%20UN%20GA%20Acknowledging%20Unification%20%26%20Independence%20of%20The%20Cameroons.pdf
>
> Could this mean there was a Union? Could this be the reason LRC, UK and UN
> are silent about our cases?. Could this be the reason the UN said our case
> is closed and the UK said we rounded up the UNION?This makes  Divine's
> suggestion of Foumban II useless.This release by HRH Gorji Dinka  must be
> taken seriously. Suggests that  we focus on 1984 and Law of creation and
> dissolution of States, to win hands down.
> ​JA​
> --
> WWW.AMBAZONIA.ORG-    ONGOING CIVIL DEFENSE FORCE SIGN UP Read
> more: http://www.ambazonia.org/index.php?option=com_content&view=article&id=306:-ambazonian-civil-defence-force-created&catid=1:latest-news-category&Itemid=265
> --
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
> "ambasbay" group.
> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an
> email to ambasbay+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com.
> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
>
>
>
>
> --
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
> "ambasbay" group.
> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an
> email to ambasbay+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com.
> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
>

--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "ambasbay" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to ambasbay+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.