RE: My Odyssey: Nfon Mukete Signs Off in Grand Style!

Atemnkeng,
I totally agree with you! I do not buy the hindsight argument. When our forefathers looked across the Mungo what did they see! A Muslim brute imposed by the French beheading his own people and having their villages burned down; French patrols with their African askaris rounding up old men and women and children and forcing them into houses which they then set on fire. The blackmail of Africans has never been so blatant and total! Why was Fonlon not by the side of Foncha all the time as an adviser! An uncle of mine who intimately knew Foncha stated that he did not really trust intellectuals; and that his fascination with Muna, for he easily gave in to him, came from the fact that he was a grade 1 teacher.
 

---

Date: Fri, 14 Mar 2014 06:09:35 -0700
From: denatem@yahoo.com
Subject: Re: My Odyssey: Nfon Mukete Signs Off in Grand Style!
To: ambasbay@googlegroups.com; asontaz@yahoo.com; asontaz4919@yahoo.com

Dear Prof.,

It is always a great delight reading from you. I enjoy the way you have presented this book, although I have not had the chance to read it myself. The clarity of your presentation is always a joy to the reader.

From your review, I have just a few comments about how we should use history and learn from history rather than make the kinds of mistakes our forefathers of the Southern Cameroons made. Fortunately, we shall reverse their mistakes!

The likes of Mukete and our Southern Cameroons fathers were incurable sentimentalists, believing in a German Kamerun they never saw, in “brothers” they had never known! They mortgaged the future of their children and their whole people on statements of a complete stranger, someone they did not know and had no reason whatever to trust. A political leader must be insane to pin the fate of his people on such unfounded trust. Some people say it is from hindsight that we criticise them. No, it should not be from hindsight. History, from the beginning of the world, teaches us that no one ever, no matter the degree of love, calls his neighbour to take over his own house so that he may become a servant to his neighbour. History, from the beginning of the world, teaches that two separate peoples never join without firm documents stating the terms of the joining, providing for how a party to the Union may withdraw if they no longer want it, providing for safeguards, especially to the weaker partner. He talks of re-unification, what proof is there other than their sentimentality? Where is a single document both sides signed to create the union he alleges? The least anyone can say is that their actions towards so-called “brothers” in French Cameroon were simply a reaction to their experiences in Nigeria and not at all based on any firm knowledge of these enemies they call brothers.

When Mukete, in his response to what should be done to the present situation says: “….I must say that what the leaders of this beautiful, God-given and blessed country should do is to reflect deeply on what is needed to remove mutual suspicions…”, he is once more falling prey of sentimentality. Colonisation lives only on violence, lies, falsehood, cheating, corruption of consciences; it has no truth on which to stand and therefore all human history again shows that it must only be defeated, never reasoned with!! If anyone has any contrary proof, let them put it on the table. Everywhere, colonization must only be defeated, but it has simply no reasoning faculties. One joy of history is that it repeats itself all the time; anyone willing to observe and reflect can see the things that must not be done and those that can be done, and what precautions must accompany those that must be done. Anyone calling on colonization to be reasonable is like one trying to reason with an animal.

It is this sickness of sentimentality we want the present generations of Southern Cameroonians to get rid of. It is not a “brother” who “should humiliate, abuse, marginalize and disdainfully spit on” you. Anyone who does that does not deserve the name of “brother”, yet for some unknown reason we continue to use this word!

When you say: “Ikomi also describes Southwesterners (and I would say Anglophone Cameroonians) as people who seem to have lost their own sense of community and oneness of purpose in a society that has been horribly corrupted and devastated by greed and selfishness; people who are incapable of dealing with objectivity and of facing the truth; people who have lost their own souls, who are weak and cowardly, who are thoughtless, divided and “unpolitical;”, this is also true. This is what colonization does to a people! Look at the great Indian People in America what they have become! Less than a shadow of themselves! You have only again to look back in history to see what this evil does. While in it, you can never see the hundredth part of its crippling effects. I am not therefore in the least surprised that while this yoke lasts, our people can only be like ghosts of themselves.

We should not spend time analysing, but summon our energies to overthrow this great evil that has befallen us, out of the weakness and sentimentality of our parents.

Atemnkeng.

 

On Wednesday, March 12, 2014 4:59 PM, Asonganyi Tazoacha <asontaz@yahoo.com> wrote:

My Odyssey: Nfon Mukete Signs Off in Grand Style!

Let me say it right from the start: “My Odyssey – The Story of Cameroon Reunification” (SOPECAM, 579 pages, 17 Chapters) is a good book, an important book, a very welcome book. History is always the loser when actors on history’s stage like Nfon Victor E. Mukete leave the stage without personal records of how they fared. He has succeeded to leave the impression in my mind that he is a big man on the reunification stage. “My Odyssey” did not have to wait until Nfon Mukete is 96, or until the reunification is 53 to be published; but as is the case in Cameroon today, if I say better late than never, many people may think that I am just borrowing Biya’s phrase used in Buea, as if I did not start hearing and using it since I entered primary school before reunification in 1961. Yes, better late than never!

I finished reading the book last weekend in Buea where I went as a “tourist” to see for myself the “changes” in the colonial capital that have become the talk of the town, so to say. When I talked about the book to some friends that attended the “reunification colloquium” at the University of Buea, they dismissed it with a wave of the hand, saying that they saw the book in the “colloquium” hall but paid no attention to it because they knew that Nfon Mukete could only write a “new deal” version of the reunification story. They were wrong!

True, Nfon Mukete can be said to be a child of two worlds. The first is the Southern Cameroons where he grew up, and in which he and his contemporaries used their “political capital” as an asset which they exploited to the advantage and benefit of Southern Cameroons, against the overwhelming, combined power of Nigeria and Britain. The second is the world Ikomi Ngongi paints for the present day Southwesterner (Anglophone). 

By some interesting coincidence, not long after I put down the book, I read a write-up in The Post Newspaper titled “How to waste socio-economic, cultural and political capital and get punished for it,” by Ikomi Ngongi. He defines “political capital” as a tangible, palpable asset at the disposal of communities and constituencies, meant to be used to their advantage and benefit whenever it is necessary; as a people’s understanding of their own collective self-worth that raises their bargaining power to bring about deserved developmental and other benefits to a community.

Ikomi also describes Southwesterners (and I would say Anglophone Cameroonians) as people who seem to have lost their own sense of community and oneness of purpose in a society that has been horribly corrupted and devastated by greed and selfishness; people who are incapable of dealing with objectivity and of facing the truth; people who have lost their own souls, who are weak and cowardly, who are thoughtless, divided and “unpolitical;” people who do not know how to use their political capital. Indeed, he thinks that they are a people who continue to be “thankful” to a political system that “humiliates, abuses, marginalizes and disdainfully spits on them”; they have mortgaged the future of their children for present individual, personal, fleeting benefits.

So, Nfon Mukete with feet firmly planted in this second world painted by Ikomi, has written the story of his (their) exploits in his first world of Southern Cameroons. This has not affected the clarity of the narrative, but the constraints of his second world have tainted his conclusions and recommendations. Many such stories usually suffer from distortion of events by failing memory or by the willful manipulation of records by participants to improve their appearance before the bar of history. It is to the credit of Nfon Mukete that he does not fall prey to this because much of what he says is supported by “authentic letters of key players.”

There may be an “intrinsic goodness inherent in human nature,” to use words from the Foreword of the book, but human history tells us that left to their own designs, human beings cannot be trusted not to try to get the better of their fellow men; there is a natural human tendency, especially those charged with wielding the power of the state, to prey on their fellow men. This is why humanity adopted the Rule of Law to hem in power, and govern its exercise.  Nfon Mukete’s two worlds are variously affected by the rule of law: in the first, the sacrosanct place of the rule of law and firm belief in its authority permitted them to use their political capital in their interest; in the second world, the virtual absence of the rule of law led to reneging on important agreements, even those signed into law!

Of course, Nfon Mukete’s generation made preparations both within their political parties and in multi-partisan meetings in Mamfe, Bamenda, Kumba, and other places, for their impending political contacts with “their brothers.” Because of the unpredictability of human nature, all such “contacts” are usually complicated operations that need laborious preparation, including elaborate simulation to guard against the incalculable of history. During such preparatory meetings, all types of scenarios are supposed to be played out in group discussions, or at least in the minds of the actors to prepare answers for all eventualities: what shall we do if the other people do this?; if this or that happens, what are the steps we will take to address them? Such thorough planning provides guards against all possible, embarrassing outcomes.

Nfon Mukete and his contemporaries did not engage in such thorough planning, so they have been variously criticized for it. This is why he states candidly that “A lot of criticism has been made about the [Foumban] Conference and its decisions. But quite frankly I really do not see what difference I [degreed and experienced] could have made in it. Ahidjo made a famous statement during the 49^th Meeting of the Fourth Committee of the UN in 1959 when he stated (capitals are Mukete’s): ‘WE (FRENCH CAMEROONS) ARE NOT ANNEXATIONISTS. IF OUR BROTHERS OF THE BRITISH ZONE WISH TO UNITE WITH INDEPENDENT CAMEROON, WE ARE READY TO DISCUSS THE MATTER WITH THEM, BUT WE WILL DO SO ON A FOOTING OF EQUALITY.’ We had no reason to doubt the sincerity of this statement. There was no issue involving a struggle by warring factions fighting for conquest over the other party…”

Hindsight is usually richer in wisdom than is usually available at decision point. Indeed, Nfon Mukete pleads that “We should not assess events at the Foumban Conference as they appear in hindsight in the 21^st Century, but instead as they looked to protagonists in the 1950s and early 1960s.” Yes, hindsight tells us that their image of essentially good “brothers” united in the quest for reunification was misplaced; they failed to integrate the fact that even a “brother” could be equally as dangerous as the Ibos that humiliated, abused, marginalized and disdainfully spat on them. That is what Ikomi Ngoni says our “brothers” are doing to us today! It is all about power: the behavior of the Ibos was a reflection of the power they wielded in Southern Cameroons governance. Nfon Mukete and his peers could have learned from the history of other peoples like Americans who discovered shortly after their independence right back in 1776 that their own “brothers” (Americans) could be equally as dangerous as the English they had just got their independence from. It is the search of Americans for self-understanding, their realization that people in power - brother or foreigner - would not on their own realize the common good, that led to the answer articulated in the American Constitution of 1789.

So what should be done? Nfon Mukete responds that “….I must say that what the leaders of this beautiful, God-given and blessed country should do is to reflect deeply on what is needed to remove mutual suspicions…” He also says in the Preface of “My Odyssey” that “This book can be read at many levels: the literal meaning given by the words on the page; the philosophical level: a good book has a hidden message, a moral lesson to be learned.” At the philosophical level, I would say that Nfon Mukete’s book is a candid call for our own search for self-understanding to provide our own appropriate answer that is long overdue. If his generation did not accept that Ibos and others should humiliate, abuse, marginalize and disdainfully spit on them, there is no reason for this generation of “Anglophones” to accept it from their “brothers.” Although Nfon Mukete’s book is only concerned with his exploits in his first world, his expression of disappointment at the neglect of the English language, the rampant corruption and embezzlement of public funds, and the absence of true decentralization are clear indicators that he is not totally happy with the state of present day Cameroon – his second world.

Nfon Mukete describes many people in his book as “staunch reunificationists: JN Foncha, ST Muna, SA George, AN Jua, AW Mukong, WNO Effiom, Nzo Ekhah Nghaky, B Fonlon, Gorgi Dinka, I Malafa, Tamajong Ndumu, VA Ngu, Ndeh Ntumazah,  and many others. One of the credits of the book is to bring these players and many others closer to the reader for critical examination. The fact that some like Foncha and Muna since apologized for their mistakes related to reunification, and others like Mukong and Gorgi Dinka think that the decision should be reversed, while others of French Cameroun origin that he also mentions like R Um Nyobe, F Moumie, E Ouandié, A Kinge and other had a rough time in the reunited Cameroon speaks volumes about how their reunification dream fared, and about the present state of the country.

PM Kale, EML Endeley, LN Namme and NN Mbile were founding members of the NCNC in 1944; PM Kale, LN Namme and JN Foncha were founding members of the CYL in 1944; VE Mukete wrote an article in West Africa Magazine in 1945 criticizing the division of Kamerun by the Milner/Simon Line. These incidents and many more brought out in the book argue strongly for the indigenous origin of the reunification struggle in Southern Cameroons; they debunk the hoary myth that Southern Cameroonians were influenced in their decision by people of French Cameroun origin settled in Southern Cameroons. The volt-face of RJK Dibonge who became a “rabid integrationist” only strengthens the argument.

The ganging up of Endeley and his party/government against a sick and dying SA George of Mamfe Constituency and his sorry treatment by the government until his death would have surely been of interest to politicians of the other myth of the SW/NW divide if it was Foncha’s government, not Endeley’s. The incident is a strong message that what a province, a region, a people need above all else, is a strong society of well informed, critical and engaged citizens capable of giving themselves the right institutions and the right leaders – strong institutions in a weak society can also be as oppressive as strongmen.

The mastery of the English Language by the author of “My Odyssey – The Story of Cameroon Reunification” and the authors of the various documents published in the book is another irrefutable testimony that the standards of today’s education are far lower than those of yesteryears. The reader will not only enjoy reading the words on the pages, but will obviously enjoy indulging in the exercise of decoding the “hidden” philosophical message in the book.

What is sure is that some people are made for troubled times; others for routine. More importantly, some people are meant for sowing the wind, and Nfon Mukete is one of such; others are for reaping the whirlwind, and the present generation is burdened with that.

Tazoacha Asonganyi

Yaounde.

 

--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "ambasbay" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to ambasbay+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "ambasbay" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to ambasbay+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.