OK Mammie Samira Edi Mesumbe
Point well taken. You wrote: "To give any merit to your post, you must cite EXAMPLES, and not limit such heavily charged accusations in the realm of speculations".
Would the mention of Our Lady of Lourdes, Sacred Heart, St. Bedes, Sasse etc mentioned in Mishe Fon's mail suffice in your fertile mind as EXAMPLES to suit your whims? I honestly don't know what other examples Madame wanted Mishe to expatiate on.
The onslaught didn't stop there. You wondered aloud: "It will be better to avoid any crass generalizations"
Mammie Mesumbe; what were the "generalizations" when Mishe Fon specifically said he wanted to limit his "Baba analysis" to only the Anglophone Provinces putting more emphasis on the Catholic land Grabbing phenomenon in the Bamendrous region? I don't actually see this response as "going Native on you". Going Native? Mama-mia. For what? Na who hap l,heure 4 foorisse? If you fail to see the Catholics as "Land Grabbers", by all means, make your case. I think I have made mine...albeit with specific EXAMPLES. Were you expecting me to produce cathoro dem "Titres Fonciers" to argue my case? How then am I inciting "Tutsi / Hutu" type violence by saying aloud what everyone knows but are conspicuously silent about? Did I say anything that is new to you? Is it because most of us went to these schools, were treated in those hospitals, attend those churches...that we should silently "Lok we Mop, Cover we Eyes and put Mukuta coton 4 we ears"...and give the Catholics (I am one) a free pass? Has the Church ever given accountability to "We the People" on the various fees (school, hospital bills etc) that are levied on us? Or you simply want us to play the Ostrich game? Mammie Mesumbe Samira, I hereby beg to take leave of this discussion by wishing you well; hopefully, we will be on the same page in future "debates".
MISHE FON
On Wednesday, April 16, 2014 1:25 PM, NDI MANJONG <ngahndi@yahoo.com> wrote:
One wonders the basis for introducing the "Hutu-Tutsi" experience to Mr. Fon's observation. No one condones how the Hutu went about the historical problem created for them and the Tutsis. The Hutus did not wake up one day and agreed among themselves to eliminate the Tutsis. The Catholic Church was involved in the historical cultivation of the problem between the two. The Germans handed to the Belgians, their colonial inclination to the Tutsis. The Catholic Church had a Social Contract with the Belgian colonial establishment. In that contract, the church was to be given the money to run their schools on condition that the education discriminated against the Hutus. It is the resentment from the years of being discriminated against that contributed to the Hutus resorting to such untold barbaric acts on the Tutsis who were their brothers before the Germans and the Belgians arrived. The church was stained by it not because people like Mr. Fon observed the church's complicity. The church is victim because its supporters looked away rather than call the church to being the advocate of justice to all beyond the nominal financial support to run schools. One can not hide a pregnancy with the hand for nine months. It is the tendency to believe it is possible that leads a DJ Eric to mention the Bambili-Babanki conflict rather than the Bali-Bawock conflict. Mr. Fon's observation is more useful to the church's introspection than silence in gratitude for the individual and collective good the church has on record. The original injecting of the Hutu-Tutsi experience into the discuss is a greater hyperbole than Mr. Fon's observation about the church's appetite for land. NDI MANJONG. |
From: Samira Ed i <samiritecreate@yahoo.com>;
To: camnetwork@yahoogroups.com <camnetwork@yahoogroups.com>; cameroon_politics@yahoogroups.com <cameroon_politics@yahoogroups.com>;
Subject: Re: [camnetwork] Re: [cameroon_politics] CATHOLICS AND THE LAND GRAB PHENOMENA IN WEST CAMEROON
Sent: Wed, Apr 16, 2014 4:26:55 PM
To: camnetwork@yahoogroups.com <camnetwork@yahoogroups.com>; cameroon_politics@yahoogroups.com <cameroon_politics@yahoogroups.com>;
Subject: Re: [camnetwork] Re: [cameroon_politics] CATHOLICS AND THE LAND GRAB PHENOMENA IN WEST CAMEROON
Sent: Wed, Apr 16, 2014 4:26:55 PM
| Baba Lucas Fon, You don't need to go native on me. You may be the writer of that email, but that element is only incidental to what is important to many -- I know you'll dispute this, and dismiss me and my concerns. If you did not dabble in a matter which bears a heavy import to the lives of Cameroonians, and the institutions mislabeled, loaded and worded in a manner that invokes hostility, with the language and the tone that could incite religious hatred, I'd have given it a pass. I'm fearful that people like you, with such incendiary posts may incite unnecessary violence and spur savages in Cameroon to take up arms and turn the country into the another Hutu/Tutsi slaughterhouse. We do not want that kind of bloodbath in Cameroon. Your post was filled with basic fundamental historical errors, which insult the readers, the country and the religious institutions which have been lumped together and tarred with an egregious brush and everyone involved by association. We have the benefit of history from which to draw lessons of caution. Religion has a totemic role in the rise of hatred and violence, no need to foment trouble. Thank you DJ Eric, You invoked a great example of a shameful episode of violence that exists between neighbours in the North West who speak basically the same dialect. " I was in CCAST Bambili during the time the Bambilis had a land issue with the Babankis. What I witnessed isn't what I could wish to happen anywhere else. Sometimes we're saved from an all out Hutu - Tutsi like war just because we have so many small ethnic groups or villages that such conflicts tend not to involve more than 50,000 people at best." DJ Eric. The word on the street is that this conflict between brothers has existed since the 1920s, and occasionally the underlying hostilities result in the break out of the most barbaric savagery. The whole of the NW is a hot bed of tension of Land disputes. As we speak, there are numerous pockets of hostilities over land between almost every village and its neighbour. When will it end? And I second your opinion, "We must refrain from being the ones to fan such discord among our brothers and sisters or among religions." DJ Eric. Absolutely. I wonder why some people have a tendency to unncessarily preach hatred! aNyango On Wednesday, April 16, 2014 3:15 PM, DJ Eric <arafonk@yahoo.com> wrote: Very true Samira, There's always two parts to every story. When we hear of one and take it for the truth, we tend to draw conclusions that don't do justice to the situation and breeds this 'air' of suspicion that is totally unnecessary. It also makes the commentator look like someone who is desperate for a bone to grind with one religion to the point that they could settle for a wild goose chase. I was in CCAST Bambili during the time the Bambilis had a land issue with the Babankis. What I witnessed isn't what I could wish to happen anywhere else. Sometimes we're saved from an all out Hutu - Tutsi like war just because we have so many small ethnic groups or villages that such conflicts tend not to involve more than 50,000 people at best. So they can be contained by the forces of law & order easily. We must refrain from being the ones to fan such discord among our brothers and sisters or among religions. I too am a proud product of a Catholic educational strata and I couldn't have wished for anything better. Cheers. Dj
|
__._,_.___
| Reply via web post | Reply to sender | Reply to group | Start a New Topic | Messages in this topic (2) |
.
__,_._,___



0 comments:
Post a Comment