PACT of Non-Aggression Re-visited; IN RESPONSE TO CLARIFY

Grand FRERE,
I saw this coming. Reason why this EXHORTATION WAS MADE DAYS
AGO...precisely on June 22, 2012.

Compatriots,
It is my singular pleasure to announce to us all that certain decisive
pathways, the results of years of effort, white pain and hot sweat,
dedication and commitment, have borne fruit - singular FRUIT.
The days ahead will, per force, divulge those pathways.
Without stiffing our democratic right to debate and agree or disagree,
and without infringing on our right to belong to this or that group, I
do implore us all to wait until we have all the facts about a pathway
before we type and send.
Hence I do propose to us all a PACT of NON-AGGRESSION.
This is because it is obvious to us all that we sometimes disagree on
strategies but not on the essential goal which goal is the full
expression of our natural and legal right to self-determination as a
PEOPLE - an independent state one way or another.
God bless the Southern Cameroons
Ntemfac Aloysius Nkong Nchwete Ofege - Prophet.
Chairman - Commission of Ways and Means
Southern Cameroons Peoples Organization.

The Exhortation stands...not only for the issue at table but for the DAYS AHEAD.
Southern Cameroonians have the right to choose and to belong to
whatever group they like...but group members should also respect the
right of others to operate in and to SPEAK for their groups. The
IMPERATIVE MANDATE is a CPDM strategy that is untenable.
Long Live the Southern Cameroons.
Solid Gold - Ntemfac Nchwete Ofege - Prophet.



On 6/26/12, George Achu <gamya39@yahoo.com> wrote:
> I agree in toto with the suggestions made by Mr. Vega and Chief Taku. Idem
> for Dr. Nfor's advice that SCAPO and the SCNC should work hand in glove.
> Even though the self-determination (sovereign independence) of Southern
> Cameroons, as an unalienable right under international law, is not subject
> to conditions - such as the unity of the people or its leaders - the
> restoration struggle can be weakened or prolonged by internecine quarrels
> such as the bad blood between the leaders of SCAPO and SCNC.
>
> As in-house wranglings, the conflicts should not be used to rationalize the
> foreign occupation, domination and exploitation (colonialism). If the
> leadership of the groups does not close ranks and unite the people to forge
> ahead with the struggle, the actors may see the promised land without
> reaching there. All nationalists ought to bury their hatchets, pursue the
> fight and then sort out things after emancipation from brazen colonialism -
> banned in all its forms by international law.
>
> To end with Nfor's wish that LET US WORK TOGETHER FOR OUR POLITICAL
> REDEMPTION AND COLLECTIVE GOOD, I strongly advice that all dirty linen be
> washed at home.
> GA
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>>________________________________
>> From: Chief Charles A.Taku <charto_us@yahoo.com>
>>To: ambasbay@googlegroups.com
>>Cc: NFOR NFOR <nnyamngaisc@gmail.com>; AFN Gwannua <afngwannua@gmail.com>;
>> Martin Yembe <mfyembe@gmail.com>
>>Sent: Tuesday, June 26, 2012 1:03 PM
>>Subject: Re: IN RESPONSE TO CLARIFY
>>
>>
>>I suggest that the lines of communication with the French researcher
>> should remain open so that we submit any further valueble information that
>> becomes available to him to complement what was provided. This is my
>> humble suggestion on how to resolve this problem. Things seem to be
>> moving faster than we expect and if care is not taken, we may be taken off
>> guard.
>>Let us move on.
>>Chief C.Taku
>>
>>--- On Tue, 6/26/12, Patrick Vega <padvega44@yahoo.com> wrote:
>>
>>
>>>From: Patrick Vega <padvega44@yahoo.com>
>>>Subject: Re: IN RESPONSE TO CLARIFY
>>>To: ambasbay@googlegroups.com
>>>Cc: "NFOR NFOR" <nnyamngaisc@gmail.com>, "AFN Gwannua"
>>> <afngwannua@gmail.com>, "Martin Yembe" <mfyembe@gmail.com>
>>>Date: Tuesday, June 26, 2012, 7:21 AM
>>>
>>>
>>>When we fight amongs ourselves, the enemy win more ground. Why can't we
>>> learn. We must learn to tolerate each other's flaws and add to ideas
>>> instead of castigating this or that. Is it a curse to be a Southern
>>> Cameroonian? Why can't we unite unite unite !! for once. EISH!!!!!!!!!
>>>
>>>--- On Tue, 6/26/12, NgwangGumne<mustakebi@yahoo.co.uk> wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>>>From: NgwangGumne <mustakebi@yahoo.co.uk>
>>>>Subject: Re: IN RESPONSE TO CLARIFY
>>>>To: "ambasbay@googlegroups.com" <ambasbay@googlegroups.com>
>>>>Cc: "NFOR NFOR" <nnyamngaisc@gmail.com>, "AFN Gwannua"
>>>> <afngwannua@gmail.com>, "Martin Yembe" <mfyembe@gmail.com>
>>>>Date: Tuesday, June 26, 2012, 4:05 AM
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>Dear Mr Nfor,
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>Thanks for your long mail in response to my mail to you.
>>>>Mine was a limited circulation. Yours-as usual-became a world
>>>> circulation.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>It is a pity that you did not read that I praised Mr Yembe for the
>>>> coverage; you did not also read that I praised you for the interview.I
>>>> praised you and Mr. Yembe.You lost sight of this when responding.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>We have information on the legal and diplomatic approaches that are not
>>>> yet in the public domai
>>>>I had requested many times before that you and Mr. Ndangamshouls work
>>>> closely together. You have never shown interest in this approach. If you
>>>> two were doing things together, you would have all this up-to-date
>>>> information that would have enriched your interview.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>I took up the Banjul case irrespective of your stiff opposition, in the
>>>> name of The Southern Cameroons and in consideration of the fact that you
>>>> are not the SCNC. At no time have I ever regarded it as belonging to any
>>>> one person.If you remember, that since the SDF days, I had never been
>>>> interested in taking up politics and that my fight is to contribute to
>>>> bringing about justice for the SC, you will have no reason to think that
>>>> I want some sort of recognition.You have shown interest and participated
>>>> in parliamentary elections as a candidate though the voters did not get
>>>> you in.This reminds me of a friend who told me they call a certain
>>>> friend, "depute manque". You would have been in parliament.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>You said Mr Ndangam was in the US; this is not true because he is in
>>>> Bamenda and he was there when you gave the interview. You did not know
>>>> because you have no interest in working together with SCAPO.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>To end, I remind you that I wrote to you with limited circulation. You
>>>> wrote back copying the world.
>>>>I praised you and Mr Yembe for the interview. I pointed out the weakness
>>>> and showed how it would have been better.Banjul is a Southern Cameroon
>>>> issue even hough it was one man's initiative. Every Southern
>>>> Cameroonian is free to quote it, including its opponents.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>Best wishes
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>ngwanggumne
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>________________________________
>>>> From: NFOR NFOR <nnyamngaisc@gmail.com>
>>>>To: NgwangGumne <mustakebi@yahoo.co.uk>
>>>>Cc: ambasbay <ambasbay@googlegroups.com>; "ambasbay@yahoogroups.com"
>>>> <ambasbay@yahoogroups.com>; Martin Yembe <mfyembe@gmail.com>
>>>>Sent: Tuesday, 26 June 2012, 6:52
>>>>Subject: IN RESPONSE TO CLARIFY
>>>>
>>>>Dr Gumne,
>>>>Sir,
>>>>Your second posting on the interview I granted to a French researcher
>>>>whether questioning, attacking or blaming whoever has necessitated my
>>>>reaction. In the first you blamed me for not bringing in your
>>>>Executive Vice for he is better informed than any of us on the Banjul
>>>>issue. I have never contested such claims and we were not writing Mr
>>>>Biya's concour here.
>>>>I note that your worry stems from the fact that by talking about it
>>>>alone, by implication I failed to give credit where it is due. Was
>>>>that the purpose of the interview? And should that have been my
>>>>preoccupation? I am not oblivious of the blames, attacks and
>>>>accusations I have received from you and SCAPO authorities which mean
>>>>nothing to me. You will notice that I have not been replying or
>>>>reacting for obvious reasons.
>>>>Firstly we do not have the luxury you people have over there to be
>>>>preoccupied with sterile issues which do not advance the struggle for
>>>>freedom.
>>>>Secondly I do not want to get involved in this blame, blame syndrome
>>>>and personality cultism. It is exclusive. It does not build
>>>>confidence. It does not bring people together. It is injurious to
>>>>human dignity and good conscience.
>>>>One thing which Mr. Martin Yembe did not say or saw no need to, is
>>>>that he did not tell his
> readers that he did not attend the interview,
>>>>he listened to it on a DVD and made his notes and published his
>>>>article. I was surprised at what he was able to do and I praised him.
>>>>And we should all do that for by his ability some of you who may never
>>>>be opportune to listen to the DVD have had a word for or against which
>>>>to me is human.
>>>>Second point of correction: You blame me for not inviting Mr Ndangam,
>>>>SCAPO Executive Vice Chairman. You expected me to have told the
>>>>French researcher to wait for me while I rushed to the USA or wherever
>>>>and to bring Mr Ndangam? Did he hand to me a list of questions so
>>>>that I should have selected those to be answered by your Executive
>>>>Vice? This war against the occupier is a collective issue and people
>>>>must be educated on their rights to fight the enemy.
>>>>I have said it before and here do reiterate – Banjul is not a personal
>>>>property of any individual or group, it
> belongs to all British
>>>>Southern Cameroonians just the same as the victory/independence when
>>>>it comes will be. We ahead, suffering as we are, are only messengers
>>>>and stewards. Below the list of complainants it is put "for and on
>>>>behalf of the Southern Cameroonian people." By this we have made
>>>>history and we should thank God for that. If any praises at all should
>>>>come tomorrow, let the people decide, don't sing it to yourself.
>>>>When we say the people's fundamental rights have been violated and
>>>>their sovereignty confiscated, we are not referring to the few on the
>>>>list of complainants or the few card bearing members on SCNC or SCAPO
>>>>register. I pray no one should reason like Chief Ayamba who has it on
>>>>record that those working with LRC or in the Diaspora should return
>>>>home and join the struggle if not they shall lose their rights of BSC
>>>>citizenship. We seem not to have gotten him rid of that
> mindset.
>>>>Third point: When in reaction to Martin's explanation, see below,
>>>>you stated "Mr Nfor did not need to say that 226 was SCNC. The fact
>>>>that he gave the interview as a Baron of the SCNC, leaves no one in
>>>>doubt as to who may have put in the 226, which remains false."
>>>>
>>>>When I read this I was forced to re-read Martin Yembe's article for I
>>>>did not understand what '226' is and I knew I never said any such
>>>>thing. I wasted valuable time which is a scarce commodity.
>>>>
>>>>Fortunately from his article I saw but 266/2003 which we all know NOT
>>>>226. You are angry that I gave the interview "as a Baron of the SCNC"?
>>>>(Whatever meaning you attach to "Baron)." You wanted me to give the
>>>>interview as a Baron of the RDPC? You need to hear the researcher's
>>>>opening statement as Martin paraphrased. The SCNC is BSC struggle for
>>>>freedom, justice and independence and the researcher wanted to know
>>>>the
> genesis of the problem, if really there is a problem and how we
>>>>Southern Cameroonians are pursuing it. He frankly confessed that few
>>>>French men know about the problem and political conflict.
>>>>
>>>>I quote from Yembe's article the reference to this issue that has
>>>>obsessed you Dr Gumne "Another option the SCNC and Southern
>>>>Cameroonians have adopted all this while is that of litigation. The
>>>>Southern Cameroons people have taken their case to the African
>>>>Commission on Human and Peoples' Rights (ACHPR) in 2003 in
>>>>Communication 266/2003."
>>>>
>>>>My mission in this interview, briefly put, was to vividly paint the
>>>>inherent distinction between BSC and LRC, the victim and the
>>>>aggressor, the victim of a failed decolonisation process and the
>>>>annexationist and coloniser and the compelling role of the
>>>>international system in conformity with the UN Charter, AU Charter and
>>>>international law for annexation is a crime against
> humanity and
>>>>threat to world peace and decolonisation a UN RESPONSIBILITY. My aim
>>>>as a messenger and steward of the people, who faithful to his defined
>>>>role does not run away from his duty and responsibility was to expose
>>>>LRC foreign aggression, territorial expansionism, imposition of
>>>>foreign domination and alien rule and that annexation and colonial
>>>>occupation is a direct declaration of war on the victim nation and
>>>>people in which the people have no option but to fight back to reclaim
>>>>their freedom and dignity. I likened this inherent right of the
>>>>Southern Cameroonian people to fight back with that of France under De
>>>>Gaulle in 1940s which with international support France was restored
>>>>to national sovereignty: BSC under international law claims that same
>>>>right of nations and peoples. I spoke for and on behalf of BRITISH
>>>>SOUTHERN CAMEROONS and its people, Southern Cameroonians, against LRC,
>>>>its government and
> agents, who ever they may be. Score me on this and
>>>>condemn or praise me.
>>>>
>>>>Yes your reaction on the BokoHaram issue is well placed and timely.
>>>>You, like others, reacted as a Southern Cameroonian whose image and
>>>>integrity is called to question in this baseless LRC imperial
>>>>accusation. You fully agree with me here for you do not have to be a
>>>>card carrying member of the SCNC. SCNC as I have said above is BSC,
>>>>the BSC voice for freedom, identity card within the international
>>>>arena, once attacked, we all are.
>>>>
>>>>The blame syndrome would have been well founded if you started by
>>>>blaming me for not singing praises to ELAD, ANYANGWE, MUNZO and itoe.
>>>>
>>>>LET US WORK TOGETHER FOR OUR POLITICAL REDEMPTION AND COLLECTIVE GOOD.
>>>>
>>>>You have the floor. Sir, thank you.
>>>>Nfor N. Nfor
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>Mr. Yembe,
>>>>
>>>>Thanks for your views.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>Mr Nfor did not need to say that 226 was SCNC. The fact that he gave
>>>>the
> interview as a Baron of the SCNC, leaves no one in doubt as to who
>>>>may have put in the 226, which remains false.
>>>>
>>>>The BokoHaram issue was mentioned somewhere linking the SCNC. When it
>>>>reached me, I did not wait for the SCNC to counter it as false.I acted
>>>>immediately and called the attention of Nfor and other SCNC factions
>>>>to act together to dispel the unfounded rumour by LRC Lobbyists.I
>>>>brought it in this time to show how we all should be our brother's
>>>>keepers.
>>>>
>>>>Thank God, the BokoHaram link to SCNC has backfired on Cameroon-not
>>>>the SCNC.You mention the post by Chief Taku. I handled the issue
>>>>together with him.
>>>>
>>>>I repeat, Mr Nfor's interview was good; it would have been better,
>>>>should he have treated it from a Southern Cameroons perspective, by
>>>>associating people with up-to-date information.This is not the time
>>>>for individual action.Please, both Nfor and you, should, from now on,
>>>>consult with Mr Ndangam on a regular basis, in order to inform
>>>>Southern Cameroonians and the international community with up-to-date
>>>>information. We have done so much that you all need to know and spread
>>>>for Southern Cameroonians and others, to know.Keep secrets off.The
>>>>Executive Vice Chairman of SCAPO is requested to to respond favourably
>>>>to this cooperation for the sake of our country.
>>>>
>>>>Best wishes
>>>>
>>>>ngwanggumne
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>
>>


--



The thing always happens that you really believe in; and the belief in
a thing makes it happen.