Re: IN RESPONSE TO CLARIFY

Chief

Kudos for being proactive. That too is leadership

Aaron

On 6/26/12, Chief Charles A.Taku <charto_us@yahoo.com> wrote:
> I  suggest that the lines of communication with the  French researcher
> should remain open so that we submit any further valueble information that
> becomes available to him to complement what was provided. This is my humble
> suggestion on how to resolve this problem.  Things seem to be moving faster
> than we expect and if care is not taken, we may be taken off guard.
> Let us move on.
> Chief C.Taku
>
> --- On Tue, 6/26/12, Patrick Vega <padvega44@yahoo.com> wrote:
>
>
> From: Patrick Vega <padvega44@yahoo.com>
> Subject: Re: IN RESPONSE TO CLARIFY
> To: ambasbay@googlegroups.com
> Cc: "NFOR NFOR" <nnyamngaisc@gmail.com>, "AFN Gwannua"
> <afngwannua@gmail.com>, "Martin Yembe" <mfyembe@gmail.com>
> Date: Tuesday, June 26, 2012, 7:21 AM
>
>
>
>
>
>
> When we fight amongs ourselves, the enemy win more ground. Why can't we
> learn. We must learn to tolerate each other's flaws and add to ideas instead
> of castigating this or that. Is it a curse to be a Southern Cameroonian? Why
> can't we unite unite unite !! for once. EISH!!!!!!!!!
>
> --- On Tue, 6/26/12, Ngwang Gumne <mustakebi@yahoo.co.uk> wrote:
>
>
> From: Ngwang Gumne <mustakebi@yahoo.co.uk>
> Subject: Re: IN RESPONSE TO CLARIFY
> To: "ambasbay@googlegroups.com" <ambasbay@googlegroups.com>
> Cc: "NFOR NFOR" <nnyamngaisc@gmail.com>, "AFN Gwannua"
> <afngwannua@gmail.com>, "Martin Yembe" <mfyembe@gmail.com>
> Date: Tuesday, June 26, 2012, 4:05 AM
>
>
>
>
>
> Dear Mr Nfor,
>
>
> Thanks for your long mail in response to my mail to you.
> Mine was a limited circulation. Yours-as usual-became a world circulation.
>
>
> It is a pity that you did not read that I praised Mr Yembe for the coverage;
> you did not also read that I praised you for the interview.I  praised you
> and Mr. Yembe.You lost sight of this when responding.
>
>
> We have information on the legal and diplomatic approaches that are not yet
> in the public domai
> I had requested many times before that you and Mr. Ndangam shouls work
> closely together. You have never shown interest in this approach. If you two
> were doing things together, you would have all this up-to-date information
> that would have enriched your interview.
>
>
> I took up the Banjul case irrespective of your stiff opposition, in the name
> of The Southern Cameroons and in consideration of the fact that you are not
> the SCNC. At no time have I ever regarded it as belonging to any one
> person.If you remember, that since the SDF days, I had never been interested
> in taking up politics and that my fight is to contribute to bringing about
> justice for the SC, you will have no reason to think that I want some sort
> of recognition.You have shown interest and participated in parliamentary
> elections as a candidate though the voters did not get you in.This reminds
> me of a friend who told me they call a certain friend, "depute manque". You
> would have been in parliament.
>
>
> You said Mr Ndangam was in the US; this is not true because he is in Bamenda
> and he was there when you gave the interview. You did not know because you
> have no interest in working together with SCAPO.
>
>
> To end, I remind you that I wrote to you with limited circulation. You wrote
> back copying the world.
> I praised you and Mr Yembe for the interview. I pointed out the weakness and
> showed how it would have been better.Banjul  is a Southern Cameroon issue
> even hough it was one man's initiative.  Every Southern Cameroonian is free
> to quote it, including its opponents.
>
>
>
>
> Best wishes
>
>
> ngwang gumne
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> From: NFOR NFOR <nnyamngaisc@gmail.com>
> To: Ngwang Gumne <mustakebi@yahoo.co.uk>
> Cc: ambasbay <ambasbay@googlegroups.com>; "ambasbay@yahoogroups.com"
> <ambasbay@yahoogroups.com>; Martin Yembe <mfyembe@gmail.com>
> Sent: Tuesday, 26 June 2012, 6:52
> Subject: IN RESPONSE TO CLARIFY
>
> Dr Gumne,
> Sir,
> Your second posting on the interview I granted to a French researcher
> whether questioning, attacking or blaming whoever has necessitated my
> reaction.  In the first you blamed me for not bringing in your
> Executive Vice for he is better informed than any of us on the Banjul
> issue. I have never contested such claims and we were not writing Mr
> Biya's concour here.
> I note that your worry stems from the fact that by talking about it
> alone, by implication I failed to give credit where it is due.  Was
> that the purpose of the interview? And should that have been my
> preoccupation? I am not oblivious of the blames, attacks and
> accusations I have received from you and SCAPO authorities which mean
> nothing to me.  You will notice that I have not been replying or
> reacting for obvious reasons.
> Firstly we do not have the luxury you people have over there to be
> preoccupied with sterile issues which do not advance the struggle for
> freedom.
> Secondly I do not want to get involved in this blame, blame syndrome
> and personality cultism. It is exclusive. It does not build
> confidence. It does not bring people together. It is injurious to
> human dignity and good conscience.
> One thing which Mr. Martin Yembe did not say or saw no need to, is
> that he did not tell his readers that he did not attend the interview,
> he listened to it on a DVD and made his notes and published his
> article. I was surprised at what he was able to do and I praised him.
> And we should all do that for by his ability some of you who may never
> be opportune to listen to the DVD have had a word for or against which
> to me is human.
> Second point of correction: You blame me for not inviting Mr Ndangam,
> SCAPO Executive Vice Chairman.  You expected me to have told the
> French researcher to wait for me while I rushed to the USA or wherever
> and to bring Mr Ndangam?  Did he hand to me a list of questions so
> that I should have selected those to be answered by your Executive
> Vice? This war against the occupier is a collective issue and people
> must be educated on their rights to fight the enemy.
> I have said it before and here do reiterate – Banjul is not a personal
> property of any individual or group, it belongs to all British
> Southern Cameroonians just the  same as the victory/independence  when
> it comes will be.  We ahead, suffering as we are, are only messengers
> and stewards. Below the list of complainants it is put "for and on
> behalf of the Southern Cameroonian people." By this we have made
> history and we should thank God for that. If any praises at all should
> come tomorrow, let the people decide, don't sing it to yourself.
> When we say the people's fundamental rights have been violated and
> their sovereignty confiscated, we are not referring to the few on the
> list of complainants or the few card bearing members on SCNC or SCAPO
> register. I pray no one should reason like Chief Ayamba who has it on
> record that those working with LRC or in the Diaspora should return
> home and join the struggle if not they shall lose their rights of BSC
> citizenship. We seem not to have gotten him rid of that mindset.
> Third point:  When in reaction to Martin's explanation, see below,
> you stated "Mr Nfor did not need to say that 226 was SCNC. The fact
> that he gave the interview as a Baron of the SCNC, leaves no one in
> doubt as to who may have put in the 226, which remains false."
>
> When I read this I was forced to re-read Martin Yembe's article for I
> did not understand what '226' is and I knew I never said any such
> thing. I wasted valuable time which is a scarce commodity.
>
> Fortunately from his article I saw but 266/2003 which we all know NOT
> 226. You are angry that I gave the interview "as a Baron of the SCNC"?
> (Whatever meaning you attach to "Baron)." You wanted me to give the
> interview as a Baron of the RDPC? You need to hear the researcher's
> opening statement as Martin paraphrased. The SCNC is BSC struggle for
> freedom, justice and independence and the researcher wanted to know
> the genesis of the problem, if really there is a problem and how we
> Southern Cameroonians are pursuing it. He frankly confessed that few
> French men know about the problem and political conflict.
>
> I quote from Yembe's article the reference to this issue that has
> obsessed you Dr Gumne "Another option the SCNC and Southern
> Cameroonians have adopted all this while is that of litigation. The
> Southern Cameroons people have taken their case to the African
> Commission on Human and Peoples' Rights (ACHPR) in 2003 in
> Communication 266/2003."
>
> My mission in this interview, briefly put, was to vividly paint the
> inherent distinction between BSC and LRC, the victim and the
> aggressor, the victim of a failed decolonisation process and the
> annexationist and coloniser and the compelling role of the
> international system in conformity with the UN Charter, AU Charter and
> international law for annexation is a crime against humanity and
> threat to world peace and decolonisation a UN RESPONSIBILITY. My aim
> as a messenger and steward of the people, who faithful to his defined
> role does not run away from his duty and responsibility was to expose
> LRC foreign aggression, territorial expansionism, imposition of
> foreign domination and alien rule and that annexation and colonial
> occupation is a direct declaration of war on the victim nation and
> people in which the people have no option but to fight back to reclaim
> their freedom and dignity. I likened this inherent right of the
> Southern Cameroonian people to fight back with that of France under De
> Gaulle in 1940s which with international support France was restored
> to national sovereignty: BSC under international law claims that same
> right of nations and peoples. I spoke for and on behalf of BRITISH
> SOUTHERN CAMEROONS and its people, Southern Cameroonians, against LRC,
> its government and agents, who ever they may be. Score me on this and
> condemn or praise me.
>
> Yes your reaction on the Boko Haram issue is well placed and timely.
> You, like others, reacted as a Southern Cameroonian whose image and
> integrity is called to question in this baseless LRC imperial
> accusation. You fully agree with me here for you do not have to be a
> card carrying member of the SCNC. SCNC as I have said above is BSC,
> the BSC voice for freedom, identity card within the international
> arena, once attacked, we all are.
>
> The blame syndrome would have been well founded if you started by
> blaming me for not singing praises to ELAD, ANYANGWE, MUNZO and itoe.
>
> LET US WORK TOGETHER FOR OUR POLITICAL REDEMPTION AND COLLECTIVE GOOD.
>
> You have the floor. Sir, thank you.
> Nfor N. Nfor
>
>
> Mr. Yembe,
>
> Thanks for your views.
>
>
>
> Mr Nfor did not need to say that 226 was SCNC. The fact that he gave
> the interview as a Baron of the SCNC, leaves no one in doubt as to who
> may have put in the 226, which remains false.
>
> The Boko Haram issue was mentioned somewhere linking the SCNC. When it
> reached me, I did not wait for the SCNC to counter it as false.I acted
> immediately and called the attention of Nfor and other SCNC factions
> to act together to dispel the unfounded rumour by LRC Lobbyists.I
> brought it in this time to show how we all should be our brother's
> keepers.
>
> Thank God, the Boko Haram link to SCNC has backfired on Cameroon-not
> the SCNC.You mention the post by Chief Taku. I handled the issue
> together with him.
>
> I repeat, Mr Nfor's interview was good; it would have been better,
> should he have treated it from a Southern Cameroons perspective, by
> associating people with up-to-date information.This is not the time
> for individual action.Please, both Nfor and you, should, from now on,
> consult with Mr Ndangam on a regular basis, in order to inform
> Southern Cameroonians and the international community with up-to-date
> information. We have done so much that you all need to know and spread
> for Southern Cameroonians and others, to know.Keep secrets off.The
> Executive Vice Chairman of SCAPO is requested to to respond favourably
> to this cooperation for the sake of our country.
>
> Best wishes
>
> ngwang gumne
>
>
>


--
Aaron Agien Nyangkwe
Journalist-OutCome Mapper
P.O.Box 5213
Douala-Cameroon