Thank you all
Napoleon, Nkambe plateau
--- On Mon, 6/25/12, NFOR NFOR <nnyamngaisc@gmail.com> wrote:
> From: NFOR NFOR <nnyamngaisc@gmail.com>
> Subject: IN RESPONSE TO CLARIFY
> To: "Ngwang Gumne" <mustakebi@yahoo.co.uk>
> Cc: "ambasbay" <ambasbay@googlegroups.com>, "ambasbay@yahoogroups.com" <ambasbay@yahoogroups.com>, "Martin Yembe" <mfyembe@gmail.com>
> Date: Monday, June 25, 2012, 10:52 PM
> Dr Gumne,
> Sir,
> Your second posting on the interview I granted to a French
> researcher
> whether questioning, attacking or blaming whoever has
> necessitated my
> reaction. In the first you blamed me for not bringing
> in your
> Executive Vice for he is better informed than any of us on
> the Banjul
> issue. I have never contested such claims and we were not
> writing Mr
> Biya's concour here.
> I note that your worry stems from the fact that by talking
> about it
> alone, by implication I failed to give credit where it is
> due. Was
> that the purpose of the interview? And should that have been
> my
> preoccupation? I am not oblivious of the blames, attacks
> and
> accusations I have received from you and SCAPO authorities
> which mean
> nothing to me. You will notice that I have not been
> replying or
> reacting for obvious reasons.
> Firstly we do not have the luxury you people have over
> there to be
> preoccupied with sterile issues which do not advance the
> struggle for
> freedom.
> Secondly I do not want to get involved in this blame, blame
> syndrome
> and personality cultism. It is exclusive. It does not build
> confidence. It does not bring people together. It is
> injurious to
> human dignity and good conscience.
> One thing which Mr. Martin Yembe did not say or saw no need
> to, is
> that he did not tell his readers that he did not attend the
> interview,
> he listened to it on a DVD and made his notes and published
> his
> article. I was surprised at what he was able to do and I
> praised him.
> And we should all do that for by his ability some of you who
> may never
> be opportune to listen to the DVD have had a word for or
> against which
> to me is human.
> Second point of correction: You blame me for not inviting Mr
> Ndangam,
> SCAPO Executive Vice Chairman. You expected me to have
> told the
> French researcher to wait for me while I rushed to the USA
> or wherever
> and to bring Mr Ndangam? Did he hand to me a list of
> questions so
> that I should have selected those to be answered by your
> Executive
> Vice? This war against the occupier is a collective issue
> and people
> must be educated on their rights to fight the enemy.
> I have said it before and here do reiterate – Banjul is
> not a personal
> property of any individual or group, it belongs to all
> British
> Southern Cameroonians just the same as the
> victory/independence when
> it comes will be. We ahead, suffering as we are, are
> only messengers
> and stewards. Below the list of complainants it is put
> "for and on
> behalf of the Southern Cameroonian people." By this we
> have made
> history and we should thank God for that. If any praises at
> all should
> come tomorrow, let the people decide, don't sing it to
> yourself.
> When we say the people's fundamental rights have been
> violated and
> their sovereignty confiscated, we are not referring to the
> few on the
> list of complainants or the few card bearing members on SCNC
> or SCAPO
> register. I pray no one should reason like Chief Ayamba who
> has it on
> record that those working with LRC or in the Diaspora should
> return
> home and join the struggle if not they shall lose their
> rights of BSC
> citizenship. We seem not to have gotten him rid of that
> mindset.
> Third point: When in reaction to Martin's
> explanation, see below,
> you stated "Mr Nfor did not need to say that 226 was SCNC.
> The fact
> that he gave the interview as a Baron of the SCNC, leaves no
> one in
> doubt as to who may have put in the 226, which remains
> false."
>
> When I read this I was forced to re-read Martin Yembe's
> article for I
> did not understand what '226' is and I knew I never said
> any such
> thing. I wasted valuable time which is a scarce commodity.
>
> Fortunately from his article I saw but 266/2003 which we all
> know NOT
> 226. You are angry that I gave the interview "as a Baron
> of the SCNC"?
> (Whatever meaning you attach to "Baron)." You wanted me
> to give the
> interview as a Baron of the RDPC? You need to hear the
> researcher's
> opening statement as Martin paraphrased. The SCNC is BSC
> struggle for
> freedom, justice and independence and the researcher wanted
> to know
> the genesis of the problem, if really there is a problem and
> how we
> Southern Cameroonians are pursuing it. He frankly confessed
> that few
> French men know about the problem and political conflict.
>
> I quote from Yembe's article the reference to this issue
> that has
> obsessed you Dr Gumne "Another option the SCNC and
> Southern
> Cameroonians have adopted all this while is that of
> litigation. The
> Southern Cameroons people have taken their case to the
> African
> Commission on Human and Peoples' Rights (ACHPR) in 2003
> in
> Communication 266/2003."
>
> My mission in this interview, briefly put, was to vividly
> paint the
> inherent distinction between BSC and LRC, the victim and
> the
> aggressor, the victim of a failed decolonisation process and
> the
> annexationist and coloniser and the compelling role of the
> international system in conformity with the UN Charter, AU
> Charter and
> international law for annexation is a crime against humanity
> and
> threat to world peace and decolonisation a UN
> RESPONSIBILITY. My aim
> as a messenger and steward of the people, who faithful to
> his defined
> role does not run away from his duty and responsibility was
> to expose
> LRC foreign aggression, territorial expansionism, imposition
> of
> foreign domination and alien rule and that annexation and
> colonial
> occupation is a direct declaration of war on the victim
> nation and
> people in which the people have no option but to fight back
> to reclaim
> their freedom and dignity. I likened this inherent right of
> the
> Southern Cameroonian people to fight back with that of
> France under De
> Gaulle in 1940s which with international support France was
> restored
> to national sovereignty: BSC under international law claims
> that same
> right of nations and peoples. I spoke for and on behalf of
> BRITISH
> SOUTHERN CAMEROONS and its people, Southern Cameroonians,
> against LRC,
> its government and agents, who ever they may be. Score me on
> this and
> condemn or praise me.
>
> Yes your reaction on the Boko Haram issue is well placed and
> timely.
> You, like others, reacted as a Southern Cameroonian whose
> image and
> integrity is called to question in this baseless LRC
> imperial
> accusation. You fully agree with me here for you do not have
> to be a
> card carrying member of the SCNC. SCNC as I have said above
> is BSC,
> the BSC voice for freedom, identity card within the
> international
> arena, once attacked, we all are.
>
> The blame syndrome would have been well founded if you
> started by
> blaming me for not singing praises to ELAD, ANYANGWE, MUNZO
> and itoe.
>
> LET US WORK TOGETHER FOR OUR POLITICAL REDEMPTION AND
> COLLECTIVE GOOD.
>
> You have the floor. Sir, thank you.
> Nfor N. Nfor
>
>
> Mr. Yembe,
>
> Thanks for your views.
>
>
>
> Mr Nfor did not need to say that 226 was SCNC. The fact that
> he gave
> the interview as a Baron of the SCNC, leaves no one in doubt
> as to who
> may have put in the 226, which remains false.
>
> The Boko Haram issue was mentioned somewhere linking the
> SCNC. When it
> reached me, I did not wait for the SCNC to counter it as
> false.I acted
> immediately and called the attention of Nfor and other SCNC
> factions
> to act together to dispel the unfounded rumour by LRC
> Lobbyists.I
> brought it in this time to show how we all should be our
> brother's
> keepers.
>
> Thank God, the Boko Haram link to SCNC has backfired on
> Cameroon-not
> the SCNC.You mention the post by Chief Taku. I handled the
> issue
> together with him.
>
> I repeat, Mr Nfor's interview was good; it would have been
> better,
> should he have treated it from a Southern Cameroons
> perspective, by
> associating people with up-to-date information.This is not
> the time
> for individual action.Please, both Nfor and you, should,
> from now on,
> consult with Mr Ndangam on a regular basis, in order to
> inform
> Southern Cameroonians and the international community with
> up-to-date
> information. We have done so much that you all need to know
> and spread
> for Southern Cameroonians and others, to know.Keep secrets
> off.The
> Executive Vice Chairman of SCAPO is requested to to respond
> favourably
> to this cooperation for the sake of our country.
>
> Best wishes
>
> ngwang gumne
>
No comments:
Post a Comment