Assoute on how Tchiroma and co ripped victims of the 1995 Nyong crash

There were two levels of corruption. When Tchiroma was minister of Transport, he gave the contract of the maintenance of CAMAIR planes to SAA (South Africa Airways). He said he favored South-South Cooperation. It is from there that Tchiroma received money and a Mercedes car. This happened in 1994.In 1998, I bought a company called ATT (Advance &Techniques Trust) from a Lebanese National. It is this company that introduced SAA to Cameroon on the basis of a lobbying contract.SAA owed money to this company ATT, and it was not paying. I therefore filed a complaint against SAA in court in South Africa. That is when SAA replied to me saying that it was not going to pay because t had used money to corrupt the authorities in my country. That is how the names of certain personalities came to light. I then informed President Paul Biya and proposed that he follow up SAA to reclaim the $65 million that CAMAIR had disbursed since 1994 within the context of the execution of the maintenance contract, simply because International Law states that any contract tainted by corruption is null and void. Cameroonian and ATT Lawyers pursued ATT SAA to the arbitral tribunal under the directives of Paul Biya who had appointed Foumane Akame Jean, his Legal Adviser to follow the proceedings in Paris and London before the arbitral tribunal. Full interview www.panafricanvisions.com, http://temp.panafricanvisions.com/?p=1578 --- On Sun, 7/1/12, Chief Charles A.Taku <charto_us@yahoo.com> wrote: From: Chief Charles A.Taku <charto_us@yahoo.com> Subject: Re: A Reply to Dr. Susunji's RE-UNIFICATION: CLARIFICATION NOTE To: ambasbay@googlegroups.com Date: Sunday, July 1, 2012, 1:35 PM Dr Mbua,  He is trying  a tactic Leke and Oben tried and failed. At least for the duo, they managed to attract the attention of La Republique before fallen back into oblivion. For Dr Susungi, please a  reeread and analysis his thought process from when he left Nigeria to Ivory Coast, then purported to have met a number of issues with the President of Liberia and his declared ambition to run for the Presidency of La Republique and now his position on the Southern Cameroons makes it difficult for La Republique to properly define him. Additionally,  if he evinced such a total ignorance about the electoral laws of La Republique, a country he wanted to rule, in the manner he declared his candidacy how can any one ascribe to him any reasonable knowledge of international law?  My position is that he be ignored, for very soon, he will find another pastime in which to try his luck at attracting the attention of La Republique. That  see him  holding himself out himself as an expert in fighting corruption. That way, he may simply be recruited as a consultant which will provide him just enough to earn a decent living again.  Chief C.Taku --- On Sat, 6/30/12, louis egbe <louis_egbe@yahoo.co.uk> wrote: From: louis egbe <louis_egbe@yahoo.co.uk> Subject: Re: A Reply to Dr. Susunji's RE-UNIFICATION: CLARIFICATION NOTE To: ambasbay@googlegroups.com Date: Saturday, June 30, 2012, 4:06 PM Hello Martin,   I am not sure many are aware what Dr. Susunji  is doing. I think he should be met with equal and firing intellectual power.  This struggle will never be considered over until the oppressors and their agents are defeated and freedom attained. Dr. Susunji has declared open intellectual war to spread propaganda so as to persuade many to join his "Presidential" bid while dissuading our people from joining the cause. This should never be allowed. He is free to become the President of LRC but NOT at the expense of our people's cause.  If he campaigns just on LRC agenda, he will be left alone. However, I will not let him on this one. I am writing another article to dismiss this propaganda of deceit. It should be made clear that this is an intellectual war.   Mbua --- On Sat, 30/6/12, Martin Yembe <mfyembe@gmail.com> wrote: From: Martin Yembe <mfyembe@gmail.com> Subject: Re: A Reply to Dr. Susunji's RE-UNIFICATION: CLARIFICATION NOTE To: ambasbay@googlegroups.com Date: Saturday, 30 June, 2012, 17:51 I have warned all those transforming the liberation struggle into an intellectual debate to beware. We can NOT be fooled ANYMORE. Thanks, Mola Mbua for this piece, but I dare state that no matter how many thesis are presented on whether or not there was (re)unification is not our point of interest now as to the fact that a people want to be free. Those who want to remain in LRC are free to, without dragging us along. I am speaking from my soul!!! Shey MF Yembe On 6/30/12, thomas sama achoa <samatom2007@yahoo.fr> wrote: > Dr Louis Egbe even the damn thing that Ahidjo called a Federation in > September 1961 before the intention > of the Southern Cameroonian people was made in October that is a month later > was wrong. > See why it was wrong let me bring Nigeria into play. Nigeria as an entity > started as a federated state of three > states that does not mean that three states were independent entities with > International Boundries as was the case > > of the Southern Cameroons, what happened in LRDC in September 1961 is just > the same like the Nigerian people > > deed by declaring a federated state from the start, so  Ahijo's Federation > does not include the Southern Cameroons into the damn thing > > what a heck is Dokta Susungi trying to tell me here? It is because of the > likes of Dokta Susungi that we are where we are > today for he dokta saw this thing coming but he failed to raised an > objection today we the young once are suffering and > scattered all over the world like sheeps without a shepherd and enstead of > him appologising to us he is there running his > mouth about nonsense is he insane or what is this all about? > > > > ________________________________ >  From: louis egbe <louis_egbe@yahoo.co.uk> > To: camnetwork@yahoogroups.com; ambasbay@yahoogroups.com; > SobaAmerica@yahoogroups.com; SOBA76@yahoogroups.com > Cc: ambasbay@googlegroups.com > Sent: Saturday, June 30, 2012 2:17 PM > Subject: A Reply to Dr. Susunji's RE-UNIFICATION: CLARIFICATION NOTE > > > Saturday, 30 June 2012 > A Reply to Dr. Susunji's RE-UNIFICATION: CLARIFICATION NOTE > > I was interested in Hon Chief Ayah's internet-circulated posting, 29 June > 2012, which clearly stated that there is no legally binding document > deposited at the UN, as required by international law enshrined in the UN > Charter that created the so-called Union between the Southern Cameroons and > La Republique du Cameroun. Hon. Ayah was correct. However, it seems Dr. > Susunji, in his own rebuttal article equally published yesterday, 29 June > 2012, in various Cameroon internet fora is stating that Hon Paul Ayah's is > misleading and that there is or was a kind of legally binding agreement. > Dr.Susunji is totally incorrect and his article is grossly misleading as the > following analysis and argument will reveal in this essay. > > In the first place, if there was any "Treaty", then that "Treaty" has been > violated since Ahidjo abrogated the Treaty in 1972 by violating the Federal > constitution that brought to birth the de facto Federation in 1961. The > Federal Constitution which came to force in September 1961 could not > possibly be classified as a Treaty since the only signatory in the document > was President Ahidjo...... > > Read the full article in: http://louis-mbua.blogspot.co.uk/