Dear shri kamakshaiah m sir,
....indeed you have thrown light upon guides more than anybody else.....As a quaruple doctorate in Business Management, Psychology, Education and Philosophy, I have seen three kinds of research supervisors viz;
1. Research guides with excellent command over research methods and techniques which includes applied statistics but unfortunately very busy with semi-academic activities such as Headship, Deanship, Principalship and so on so forth.....
2. This category is busy with extraneous, non-academic academic activities such as real estate, share market business, other business activities and at times indulging in drinking, etc. or spending time for hobbies....
3. Third category does not know anything about research - neither theoretical research nor applied research....research scholar has to struggle on his own, either from his colleagues or from other professors, at times, on payment please....
.....hence it all depends upon the luck of the research scholar.....
.... best wishes....
.... dr vishnumurty narra, hyderabad....
--- On Wed, 29/5/13, kamakshaiah m <editorijrem@gmail.com> wrote:
From: kamakshaiah m <editorijrem@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [MTC Global] Don't ever attempt to do Ph.D. in Business Management if you satisfy all or any one of the following conditions.
To: join_mtc@googlegroups.com
Date: Wednesday, 29 May, 2013, 12:28 PM
Dear Sir,
In deed, although, these instructions could serve as eight important commandments to research scholars. It seems, there is lot of discussion here around these points which appears to be little lopsided (sorry for being discourteous). Though I am not a PhD guy, I shall opine that research is although an individual effort, in deed, is a process that revolves round scholar, guide and University. It is not that scholar alone is the object of blame but also guide and institution. In fact, it is the guides who sweepstakes more responsibility than the scholar, I believe. Are there not guides who doesn't know about research? I personally know a person who did double PhD (PDF from France) who hates analytical tools and never proscribe statistics to his scholars for he personally dislike statistics (perhaps and he dislikes might be due to his difficulty to understand them). There is the other man (sorry Dr.) who openly say to his scholars that he is not aware of any methods, but he could sign provided somebody guide him. There are several such examples which are, in fact, known to everyone of us.
How many Universities have right guides who possess sufficient research stamina? There are umpteen number of scholars that are suffering due to certain vagaries of few guides. One of my friends, who were pursuing his PhD in USA, had to cancel his study since his guide doesn't like his theme.........
Hence, In my opinion (only opinion) these instructions also applies to guides besides scholars! or if there are different instructions please let us know!
Regards,
-- MTC GLOBAL- Educate, Empower, Elevate --- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Management Teachers Consortium, Global" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to join_mtc+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
|
0 comments:
Post a Comment