Dear colleagues,
UGC-NET qualified individuals are not treated with respect anywhere in
India (perhaps I shall say respected by only those UGC-NET), these
individuals are downplayed by several senior most academicians during
interviews. All are interested in PhD, while I accept the superiority
of PhD in academics, also need to look at the worsening state of PhD
qualification. I personally know people acquiring PhD just by paying
few lump-sums of money, and getting placed in Deemed Universities
other Autonomous institutions, same individuals turn up as guides.
There are also great institutes that are strictly confined to quality,
we need to respect these institutions for they always at the helm of
the domain.
At some time, I heard from some senior academician saying that UGC-NET
is only a test/exam but it doesn't vouch skill, in which case, where
there are no tests? does it mean that those academic qualifications
that are acquired by tests/exams are useless qualifications? If that
is the case a typical PhD is also mere submission of dissertation.
Where is ideal PhD work? is a typical PhD work has such a stamina to
be prescribe under the syllabus under somewhere? There are pros and
cons every where! the argument is not about the superiority or
inferiority but about regulations. We know why Govt. of India came up
with such a vigorous norms. Is it fair on our part to treat things
beyond regulations, if so, by what capacity do individuals speak
against regulations?
It is clear that those who can not qualify UGC-NET criticize the same,
individuals who after several attempts could not qualify this, and
develop negative attitude to the same and start slinging dust over
those qualified.
I am sorry if I spell my message in emotion! but dear brothers and
sisters, we all are simple beings need to act by rationality but not
by assessments at the cost of our professional success. I know,
individual's suffering to wrong evaluations and assessments. There are
individuals who loose opportunity by these unrighteous assessments
during interviews.
Surprisingly, these typical institutions could select individuals with
PhDs, irrespective of their research stamina, but it is unfortunate to
see individuals with good research stamina without PhD loosing
opportunity.
I humbly ask a question, what is the actual requirement? is it
qualification or quality?
The following statement by Wilson Mizner ( a famous American
playwright) at times appears to be true, he said: "If you steal from
one author it's plagiarism; if you steal from many it's research."
On 7/27/13, Rajesh Arora <pravish123@gmail.com> wrote:
> Respected Sir,
>
> I am from Delhi and highly appreciated what had been stated above.
>
> I am Phd holder in Management as per UGC 2009 rules and also UGC NET
> qualified.
>
> At present I am having great difficulty in getting a simple faculty job.
>
> Earlier before Phd and NET during interviews persons use to state that as I
> am not Phd holder and not NET qualified though having around 25 years of
> experience at age of around 48 years I can get only minimal salary.
>
> Now when everything is ok and interviews also go above expectations
> interviews get red faced. In IP University approved institutions I had
> noticed a trend that after interview they say that as our rules assistant
> is paid Rs.25,000 and associate is paid Rs.30,000 provided one submits 10
> years experience certificate. Where are UGC rules now? For qualifications
> all UGC rules are followed but for disbursements their own rules are
> followed. Tell me who can not even pay half of the as per rules will ever
> issue experience certificate on demand?
>
> Even one of the reputed institution affiliated to IP University went an
> expend further that that you will be required to submit your all original
> certificates with us.
>
> This is the state of education sector at center ion remote areas it must be
> much worse. what kind of services such demoralized exploited freshers
> appointed by them will deliver good quality of teaching. Persons just
> completed education without industrial exposure are now being appointed.
> Persons like me with industry and academic experience are being thrown out.
>
> There is more but all cannot be stated on mails.
>
> On side it would had been better if I had started and Institution myself
> atleast my family would not had starved during this time. I think faculty
> age of retirement had been reduced to 50 years.
>
> Thanks,
> Dr. Rajesh Arora.
>
>
> On Fri, Jul 26, 2013 at 3:24 AM, Virendra Goel
> <goel.virendra@gmail.com>wrote:
>
>> I am sure some of my friends love to read the following new item
>> appearing
>> in EDU.****
>>
>> ** **
>>
>> Joint director of Education refutes NU colleges claims****
>>
>> *25 July 2013 *****
>>
>> *Dilip** Patil the Joint director of higher education for Nagpur region
>> has proven that the claims of Nagpur University's 250 banned colleges of
>> not getting qualified NET/SET candidates are false*
>>
>> ** **
>>
>> Joint director of higher education for Nagpur region Dilip Patil has
>> refuted the claims of Nagpur University's 250 banned colleges. The
>> colleges
>> had stated that NET/SET qualified candidates were not available to them
>> for
>> appointment as teachers. The banned colleges have been pleading their
>> case
>> on the basis of a lack of suitable candidates. They are seeking relief
>> from
>> the ban from the Nagpur bench of the Bombay High Court and the hearing is
>> to resume on Thursday.****
>>
>> Patil stated that his office has received more than 160 applications for
>> every lecturers post from NET/SET qualified candidates. The applications
>> were made in response to advertisements for post of lecturers at a
>> government-run college. Dilip Patil spoke to various media saying "These
>> banned colleges are misleading everyone through their claims. If such a
>> large number of NET/SET candidates could vie for a single post, I wonder
>> why they do not apply for these colleges,".****
>>
>> The joint director clarified that this was not a onetime occurrence.
>> Each
>> advertisement for teachers has gotten an incredible response for
>> qualified
>> candidates. He added "We don't have any magic wand or a secret. The
>> reason
>> is simple - we pay full salary, unlike many non-granted colleges that
>> exploit the teachers to the hilt by paying meagre salary,".****
>>
>> Patil previously washed his hands off the alleged "illegal" decisions
>> made by NU's Academic Council and later adapted by the Management
>> Council.
>> He stated that hundreds of NET/SET and PhD qualified candidates are
>> unemployed and looking for jobs but avoided the non-granted colleges
>> because of the low salaries offered.****
>>
>> He stated to the press "I can bet they would get qualified candidates if
>> they paid salary at par with government colleges. In reality, a majority
>> of
>> them don't make any effort to recruit teachers. They're there just for
>> the
>> sake of minting money and exploiting the students," he claimed. The joint
>> director attributed their advertisement campaign for getting such a large
>> number of applications. "We issue ads in all national dailies and also
>> across vernacular languages and Internet as well. We receive applications
>> from across the country including Uttar Pradesh, Bihar and Karnataka. Ask
>> these banned colleges to float advertisements on various job portals and
>> see how much response they get,".****
>>
>> Patil also claimed that contributory teachers were paid a decent amount
>> of Rs24,000 per month by the government. He said "The non-granted
>> colleges
>> don't pay even that much. Why all granted colleges get teachers in
>> abundance and non-granted struggle to find them? It is nothing but a
>> mockery of entire education system".****
>>
>> ** **
>>
>> ** **
>>
>> ** **
>>
>> --
>> MTC GLOBAL- Educate, Empower, Elevate
>> ---
>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
>> "Management Teachers Consortium, Global" group.
>> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an
>> email to join_mtc+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com.
>> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
>>
>>
>>
>
> --
> MTC GLOBAL- Educate, Empower, Elevate
> ---
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
> "Management Teachers Consortium, Global" group.
> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an
> email to join_mtc+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com.
> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
>
>
>
--
________________
Thanks & Regards
________________
Kamakshaiah Musunuru
http://mkamakshaiah.tk
www.ijrem.in
http://sri-india.tk
+91-9177573730 (AP)
--
MTC GLOBAL- Educate, Empower, Elevate
---
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Management Teachers Consortium, Global" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to join_mtc+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
Re: [MTC Global] 250 banned colleges in Nagpur for not appointing NET/SET qualified teachers
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
Blog Archive
- August 2017 (812)
- July 2017 (901)
- June 2017 (772)
- May 2017 (456)
- April 2017 (441)
- March 2017 (5741)
- February 2017 (5497)
- January 2017 (6563)
- December 2016 (2855)
- November 2016 (1454)
- October 2016 (1335)
- September 2016 (1241)
- August 2016 (1409)
- July 2016 (1295)
- June 2016 (1300)
- May 2016 (1331)
- April 2016 (1331)
- March 2016 (1425)
- February 2016 (1311)
- January 2016 (1341)
- December 2015 (1337)
- November 2015 (1355)
- October 2015 (1443)
- September 2015 (1390)
- August 2015 (1393)
- July 2015 (1447)
- June 2015 (1380)
- May 2015 (1299)
- April 2015 (1402)
- March 2015 (1383)
- February 2015 (1280)
- January 2015 (1350)
- December 2014 (1360)
- November 2014 (1180)
- October 2014 (1418)
- September 2014 (1382)
- August 2014 (1287)
- July 2014 (1344)
- June 2014 (1354)
- May 2014 (1355)
- April 2014 (1321)
- March 2014 (1323)
- February 2014 (1214)
- January 2014 (1378)
- December 2013 (1246)
- November 2013 (1207)
- October 2013 (1350)
- September 2013 (1420)
- August 2013 (1536)
- July 2013 (1527)
- June 2013 (1446)
- May 2013 (1457)
- April 2013 (1459)
- March 2013 (1500)
- February 2013 (1345)
- January 2013 (1455)
- December 2012 (1292)
- November 2012 (1333)
- October 2012 (1439)
- September 2012 (1334)
- August 2012 (1323)
- July 2012 (1225)
- June 2012 (1259)
- May 2012 (312)
- April 2012 (25)
- March 2012 (21)
- February 2012 (3)
Powered by Blogger.
0 comments:
Post a Comment