That's good point, Howard. Composite IS more technique sensitive, and I think sometimes amalgam is used as an excuse for lousy technique by guys who can't or won't or haven't learned how to do a proper composite.
On Thu, Sep 26, 2013 at 7:26 PM, Howard Elson <drels@fyi.net> wrote:
Amalgam is, most certainly, a more "forgiving" material than composite. That having been said, some practitioners cross the line from using a material that will work in less than "close to ideal" situations, to not attempting to create the "close to ideal" situations and be able to use a superior material and produce a superior restoration.
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "ACEsthetics" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to acesthetics+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com.
To post to this group, send email to acesthetics@googlegroups.com.
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/acesthetics.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
No comments:
Post a Comment