TRADITIONAL RULERS: AESOP's FABLE, "THE OAK AND THE REEDS"

STOOP TO CONQUER (AESOP'S FABLE, THE OAK AND THE REED)

"A VERY LARGE OAK was uprooted by the wind and thrown across a

stream. It fell among some Reeds, which it thus addressed: "I
wonder how you, who are so light and weak, are not entirely
crushed by these strong winds." They replied, "You fight and
contend with the wind, and consequently you are destroyed; while
we on the contrary bend before the least breath of air, and
therefore remain unbroken, and escape."


Mukefor Besongabang
Classical Scholar

To: camnetwork@yahoogroups.com; ambasbay@googlegroups.com; cameroon_politics@yahoogroups.com
From: anomah007@yahoo.com
Date: Wed, 26 Feb 2014 07:35:58 -0800
Subject: [cameroon_politics] Re: [camnetwork] TRADITIONAL RULERS: “Render to Caesar the things that are Caesar’s...."


Obama showing respect to Saudi King Abdullah in his Kingdom

From: Dennis Tambe <dbtmamfe@hotmail.com>
To: "ambasbay@googlegroups.com" <ambasbay@googlegroups.com>; "cameroon_politics@yahoogroups.com" <cameroon_politics@yahoogroups.com>; camnetwork Camnetwork <camnetwork@yahoogroups.com>
Sent: Wednesday, February 26, 2014 10:24 AM
Subject: [camnetwork] TRADITIONAL RULERS: “Render to Caesar the things that are Caesar’s...."




Culled From The Nigerian Nostalgia Project 1955-1980 (Sardauna of Sokoto, Amadou Bello bows and two-handedly greets Queen Elizabeth II).

Manu Tayong,
Thanks, my man.  You never disappoint with your research.
From colonial days, our traditional leaders have learned to "“Render to Caesar the things that are Caesar’s, and to God the things that are God’s.
Royals must whack.
Mukefor

Wed, 26 Feb 2014 06:51:37 -0800
From: anomah007@yahoo.com
Subject: Re: [cameroon_politics] TRADITIONAL RULERS: LAUGHING STOCKS OF THE NEWDEAL
To: ambasbay@googlegroups.com; cameroon_politics@yahoogroups.com; camnetwork@yahoogroups.com

As rule of thumb!!!!!!
Right_left_john_b1_ndeh_do_santa_an
      NEVER PRAY FOR BIYA WITH YOUR EYES CLOSED

NEVER BOW TO BIYA WITH YOUR HEAD BLOW HIS CHIN!!! 

From: Dennis Tambe <dbtmamfe@hotmail.com>
To: "cameroon_politics@yahoogroups.com" <cameroon_politics@yahoogroups.com>; camnetwork Camnetwork <camnetwork@yahoogroups.com>; "ambasbay@googlegroups.com" <ambasbay@googlegroups.com>
Sent: Wednesday, February 26, 2014 6:01 AM
Subject: RE: [cameroon_politics] TRADITIONAL RULERS: LAUGHING STOCKS OF THE NEWDEAL

Netters,
Can one of our astute researcher like my man Manu Tayong, please come up with a good photograph of a North West Fon kowtowing to the Fon of Fons?   I am very sure there is one somewhere. 

This is all about Cameroon gerontocratic politics of spoils and largesse that has bedeviled The Republic of Cameroon and its former federated States. When the North West Province plays it, its jaundiced journalists and allied SCNC sweep it under the carpet. 


When North West road contractors contrived and contributed exactly the same amounts to the last Presidential campaign to consolidate their stranglehold on that sector, North West journalists and SCNC detractors keep quiet.

When a one billion FCFA road contract is awarded to a former shop keeper, an SCNC stalwart Bens Awaah praises this turpitude in the award of State contracts that results in bad road construction as good "Ali Baba" fortitude which brings benefits the North West Province.

When I astutely raise the issue of  North West journalists' old boy network at the World Bank, the SCNC apologist Mr Boh Herbert goes silent.

When I astutely raise the North West's duplicity in not fighting for a road from Victoria to Bamenda, to cement the much vaunted Anglophone solidarity, SCNC goes mute.

Once bitten twice shy. Only fools allow themselves to be naively fooled twice. 

"Mukefor and his ilk will be shut down."  Mr Ntemfac Ofege, this is not about me.  I have presented the history and facts of the discord between our regions as written by North Western researchers.  South Western peoples have read and appreciated my detached and disinterested approach to this issue.  I have no axe to grind. I earn my keep and live better than Cameroon State ministers.  Let's stop this tomfoolery about me fighting for State largesse.

Mukefor



To: ambasbay@googlegroups.com
CC: cameroon_politics@yahoogroups.com; camnetwork@yahoogroups.com; cameroongroup@yahoogroups.com; boba-list@yahoogroups.com
From: ntemfacnchwete@gmail.com
Date: Wed, 26 Feb 2014 11:14:44 +0100
Subject: Re: [cameroon_politics] TRADITIONAL RULERS: LAUGHING STOCKS OF THE NEWDEAL

 

Inline image 1


On Wed, Feb 26, 2014 at 9:36 AM, Ayaba Cho Lucas SOUTHERN CAMEROONS INDEPENDENCE <yabaluc@hotmail.com> wrote:
Prof,

Chief should not ignore. We have ignored for too long as a narrative was constrcuted that became the objective unalterable reality. We have been fighting on different fora to change this single story narrative defined by an abysmal system to hold us down. We have shut down Susungi 'treaty argument'. One step at a time people from the very Southern Region are taking issue with the instrumentalising mentality designed to keep the occupier in our land. Mukefor and his ilk will be shut down. It took a Panel in Yaounde to open the eyes of many. A one man soldier walking using a walking aid shut down the argument in Buea. Mola showed us that we must be engaged and take the fight to the occupier and its detractors. Chief was the one who helped launched the SCYL and provided the first ever financial support to us during the Molyko Church service that launched the League. When my colleagues were kidnapped and locked up in Yaounde, these bigots were praying for their dead. It was Chief who stood out as the defence Counsel. His greatest contribution yet is standing up in his different writings against the narrative of the junta and its supporters. These bigots will not write the tale of the resistance because we are already writing our own story. Let the intellectual battle continue

Subject: Re: [cameroon_politics] TRADITIONAL RULERS: LAUGHING STOCKS OF THE NEWDEAL
To: ambasbay@googlegroups.com; cameroon_politics@yahoogroups.com; camnetwork@yahoogroups.com; CameroonGroup@yahoogroups.com; boba-list@yahoogroups.com
From: carlany2001@yahoo.com
Date: Wed, 26 Feb 2014 07:44:14 +0000



Indeed Chief, just ignore.

I must call Christmas to order. All the more so as he is in a position of leadership. And leaders should be exemplary in their conduct.

Each time I read attacks, insults and intemperate language by us against each other I feel very, very sad. What is wrong with us? I have sometimes had to think that there is probably a curse hanging over our heads as a people. A curse having a debilitating effect on our collective long struggle for freedom against a vile and cunning form of colonialism that surpasses apartheid.

It would seem this curse has been there right from the days of the nonsensical pro-Nigeria and pro-Republique du Cameroun destructive politics.

It has continued down to this day of an equally divisive and destructive politics where some of our very own people seek to keep us caged for ever in colonial serfdom on false arguments based on rabid tribalism and colonial patronage.

We have a common enemy hell bent on destroying us as a people and extinguishing our Homeland. And here we are training our AK47 at each other rather than at the colonial occupier!!!

A misguided pen can be just as destructive as an uncontrollable tongue. I would suggest that each time we decide to write or to speak we must first ask ourselves whether what we want to communicate advances the cause of our national liberation. If it does not then we should advice ourselves to stay quiet; after all, more often than not silence is golden.

CA
Sent via my BlackBerry from Vodacom - let your email find you!

From: "Chief Charles A.Taku" <charto_us@yahoo.com>
Date: Tue, 25 Feb 2014 09:08:44 -0800 (PST)
Subject: Re: [cameroon_politics] TRADITIONAL RULERS: LAUGHING STOCKS OF THE NEWDEAL

 Christmas,
 I understand your focus. Do not drag me into it. Handle it the way you started it.  It may be you have been looking for an opportunity to write something about me. I will not grant you that luxury because it may let persons perceived as friends quarreling in public about public affairs. 
First I have not attacked Dr Munzu and there is no need to do that. He is a lawyer and understands that I commented on his new position as all reasonable lawyers were trained to do.
He had argued against other positions previously which is his right. He argued in support of others which again is his right. 
 You may be extremely intolerant to the extent that you have responded to my comment without reading what Charly Gabriel Mbock wrote using the pictures to illustrate that elicited my comment. Or may just be you had little time to read the lengthy article.
 What I have done for the cause. Let us start from the days of CAM, AAC1, the several cases of illegal arrest, torture and incarceration. Significant contributions to missions abroad from CAM till date. If want SCARM can produce and post the receipt and you will marvel those who travelled with contributions from me.  At least the late Albert Mukong did acknowledge my contribution in writing. He and me established the Human Rights Defense Group and I provided the financial resources. When he was paid for the violations of his right, he came looking for me to pay back the amounts. He left his books in my office and I have priceless correspondences with him acknowledging my contributions. When hundreds of Southern Cameroonians were kidnapped to Yaoundé and indicted at the Military Court you were in Cameroon not so? That office that was used as the Secretariat for AAC1 did not belong to me it belong to some one else, you may be pleased to conclude.  But thousands of Southern Cameroonians who turned up for that historic conference are still grateful to me. I obtained the permit for AAC1 from Etame Massoma the then governor. I have granted hundreds of scholarships to Southern Cameroonians. I provided employment to young aspiring Southern Cameroonians at the Special Court for Sierra Leone, the UNICTR but also Francophones. I indeed, I have not been discriminatory when it comes to my professional affairs.  I do not bring politics or activism into my professional affairs. Some people do not know how and where to draw the line. I have not and will not tribalize the Southern Cameroons struggle. I did not and will not use it to get an advantage in status or otherwise.
 I am consistent, predictable, respect opposing opinion, do not involve in gossip and continue to help and assist hundreds of Southern Cameroons students. I have disagreed on the Southern Cameroons cause with people whose rights I defended and defended to the best of my ability. If I get a phone call from any of them asking me to assist them as I did previously, I will. I am so sure that I will do the same with you any more. I have mentored many Southern Cameroons but some many Francophones. I will continue to do so..  On my watch for 15 years in the Bar Council, with Ben Muna we changed the face of the Bar.
I have provided pro bono legal services to Francophones and Anglophones alike including many who were wrongly jailed in Kondengui. 
My contribution is not sentimental. It is real. I have stood for the course of justice and respectfully helped people without considering their party affiliation. 
I hate to write about myself. I hate even to post my pictures and credentials as some people may want to do because I do not render public service for self glorification. I am  not seeking relevance or recognition any where. I am happy the way God created me. I am humble, friendly and ever willing to help.
You are the first to force me write about myself. I resent it. I am not ready to get involve in the game some play here by picking quarrels to assert self relevance.
Yes I have published in my field of practice and became the first African ever to win a Major case at an International Criminal Tribunal. I have no regrets. It is the will of God. If you cannot ever write without attacking or insulting some one, seek those who enjoy insults and leave me alone.
 If you have no contribution to the article of Charly Gabriel Mbock, do not venture to attack me for reading, understanding and reacting. I have willfully avoided commenting with the postings you have been making. I intervene once when you publicly urged me to defend you about an accusation a number of people you interviewed in Cameroon brought against you. I came to your defense to the best of my knowledge because although I had heard the same accusations made, I do not subscribe to persons making serious accusations against others without proof. From your misconstruction of my disagreement with the opinion of Dr Munzu which is essentially legal, I am now sure that if you had a way to spread mud against me you will not hesitate. Fortunately I am a different kind of person.  Write on. The public is the judge.  They know who has contributed to the cause and those who have attempted to undermine it. They know those who write and attack people and those who do not. They know in particular those who are conducting public debates in the level of civility required of educated people and those who do not. Therefore write on. I will choose to ignore.
 Sincerely,
 Chief Charles A.Taku


On Tuesday, February 25, 2014 9:28 AM, noelebini <noelebini@yahoo.com> wrote:
 
Chief Taku I do not think these chiefs and Fons have any problems but I think you do because for more than twenty yours you have been writing big book and legal analysis about them and they keep doing what they know how to do best. The point here is you want freedom from them and the system. Tell us exactly what you have effectively been doing to get that freedom besides writing and pointing fingers. How much of your income do you dedicate towards the cause of Southern cameroons freedom. You create room to fight amongst yourselves over who is the most authentic and self righteous southern Cameroonian in the struggle with nothing to show go pass empty book talk. How can anyone take us seriously if all we know how to do is label each other and refuse to accept our real problem. Today the target is Munzu because he might have said something some of you do not seem to like or agree with


Sent from my Verizon Wireless 4G LTE smartphone


-------- Original message --------
From: "Chief Charles A.Taku"
Date:02/25/2014 3:01 AM (GMT-05:00)
To: Cameroon Politics ,Ambazonian emancipationists
Subject: [cameroon_politics] TRADITIONAL RULERS: LAUGHING STOCKS OF THE NEWDEAL

 

"Where are we?" was a popular program over Radio Buea when we growing up. And I ask the question, where are we? in the light of the humiliation some Southern Cameroons traditional rulers subjected themselves before Paul Biya and the world at large.  Everyone can see a visibly bemused but satisfied Paul Biya acknowledging this traditional ruler among others surrendering his humanity to the God President. What a pity!  To some of our royal fathers,  coming into contact, bowing down in slave-like submission  and shaking the hand of the most divine god president for life guaranteed a place in Alibaba's paradise of survival. Again what a pity!  One can imagine the bewilderment on the face of the Presidential aide who must  be wondering: Are these chiefs that desperate?
Are these  in the past been the persons  deceiving Paul Biya with spurious motions of supports, speeches and petitions that they have the mandate of their people to speak on behalf of the Southern Cameroons?
 Lets be serious, by going so low many of them, in particular those caught in these Presidential pictures protruding before Paul Biya have lost all authority, traditional or otherwise to exercise traditional rule.  Our customs expressly forbid  this disgraceful display of helplessness, and permit me, self humiliation by traditional rulers. This display reveals in part, the identity of those have been dragging our people and traditions in the mud.
Thanks Charly Gabriel Mbog and http://www.icicemac.com/ for bringing out these disgraceful scenes to illustrate the moral decay into which society under Paul Biya has descended.
 Chief Charles A.Taku

Actualité
Le Cameroun, miroir de l'individualisme présidentiel
Publié le 25-02-2014  |  (Yaoundé - Cameroun). Auteur : Charly Gabriel Mbock  


              
 
Le Cameroun, miroir de l'individualisme présidentiel
© Charly Gabriel Mbock
Le Cameroun, miroir de l'individualisme présidentiel


 

Nous avons, de Césaire, aimé le Discours sur le colonialisme. Loin de prétendre à la même qualité, un discours sur l'individualisme vient d'être servi au peuple du Cameroun par le Président de la république. Le peuple du Cameroun y a été marqué au fer de l'indignation présidentielle, au point de subir une flagellation publique, urbi et orbi. C'était l'injure à ne pas faire aux Camerounais, d'autant moins qu'ils ne sont pas convaincus de l'avoir méritée. Car il n'est pas encore établi que parlant de l'individualisme comme il a cru devoir le faire, le Président de la république du Cameroun ait parlé ni du peuple, ni au peuple du Cameroun. Les Camerounais ne s'y reconnaissent manifestement pas, ou à une très infime proportion - par ailleurs circonscrite au sommet de l'Organisation au pouvoir.

Comment le Président de la République du Cameroun en est-il donc arrivé à se convaincre, lui, que c'est par l'individualisme que le monde entier devrait désormais identifier ses ''Chers Compatriotes'' ? La question est loin d'être mineure ; elle ne peut être abordée à la légère au regard de sa gravité. Car il y a pire que de s'être préféré à son peuple pendant trois décennies : c'est de se tromper de peuple, après 80 ans.

Mon moi à moi !
cinquantenaire_de_la_reunification_buea (126)Point n'est besoin d'avoir fait ses classes de Philosophie pour avoir une idée recevable de ce qu'est l'individualisme. Ce phénomène humain et social ne se limite pas à sa portée théorique et cérébrale. L'individualisme se situe moins dans l'ordre de la pensée que dans l'ordre du vécu : il s'expérimente au quotidien par les diverses frustrations qu'il inflige à tous ceux qui en subissent les morsures.

Le premier dictionnaire à portée de la main le définit comme tendance à considérer les droits et les intérêts de l'individu qu'on est comme supérieurs aux droits et aux intérêts des autres membres de la société. Cette attitude se traduit aussi par le refus de " faire corps " ou de " faire équipe " avec les autres, dans un groupe ou dans une collectivité, pour plutôt faire, comme on dit, " cavalier seul ". Ce rejet de toute forme de solidarité ou de partage est aussi connu sous le nom d'égocentrisme ou d'égoïsme. Ces différents termes plus ou moins apparentés renvoient au même champ sémantique de l'individualisme : tous signifient qu'en toutes circonstances, mon " moi " est privilégié au détriment de tout ce qui n'est pas " moi ". Alors, mon " moi " à moi est le centre de tout, puisque que je me suis, moi, constitué le centre de tout. Dans l'ordre de la répartition des avantages et des richesses, l'individualiste transforme toute une nation en un gâteau au milieu duquel il s'installe. Sa ligne d'inconduite est simple : " ce qui est à moi est à moi ; ce qui est à toi est à nous ".

Ce phénomène est si sournois et si dissimulé qu'il y a toujours quelque risque à parler de l'individualisme. Aussi longtemps qu'on se souvienne, nul n'en parle généralement que pour en accabler les autres, jamais pour assumer le sien propre. Ce risque a donné naissance à des controverses instructives entre des penseurs connus tout au long des siècles passés. (...)

Du Renouveau individualiste au Cameroun
Biya-Ezzat.jpg

Compte tenu de cette longue tradition d'analyse et de débat sur la question, le Discours sur l'individualisme dont le Président de la République du Cameroun s'est fendu le 31 décembre 2013 aurait beaucoup du mal à revendiquer la moindre originalité. Cette sortie purement rhétorique serait même passée totalement inaperçue pour défaut d'intérêt n'était la fonction de son auteur ; car celui qui remet ce vieux débat à l'ordre du jour est, à lui seul, toute une institution d'Etat: c'est le Président de la République, Chef de l'Etat du Cameroun. C'est dire que seule la haute fonction qu'assume l'auteur justifie qu'on s'y arrête un moment.

Les Camerounais l'ont donc tous entendu : nous serions " un peuple d'individualistes... ". Le Président de la République du Cameroun ne s'est pas contenté de l'affirmer. Pour une fois qu'il donne l'impression de nous connaître et de nous parler, il s'est efforcé de le démontrer et de nous en convaincre par un développement accablant. Au-delà d'un simple reproche, il s'agissait d'un véritable réquisitoire. Les vœux à charge du 31 décembre 2013 auront donc, sans appel, lourdement incriminé tout le peuple du Cameroun. Car à la différence de certains autres peuples où le moi est " très haïssable ", notre moi à nous autres Camerounais serait plutôt " très adorable ". Alors, chacun de nous ne jurerait plus que par l'adage populaire :''Charité bien ordonnée commence par soi-même''. Le conditionnel est de rigueur parce qu'il n'est pas certain que les Camerounais se reconnaissent dans cette caricature. Et c'est la raison de notre propos.

En effet la thèse présidentielle de l'individualisme national demande d'être établie comme vérité d'argument et non simplement assénée comme argument d'autorité. N'en déplaise aux experts en Vuvuzelas laudatifs, il ne suffit pas que le Chef de l'Etat ait affirmé une chose pour que cette affirmation devienne aussitôt une vérité scientifique. Sa sortie sur l'individualisme eût donc gagné à être moins déclarative que démonstrative. Quand cet accablant diagnostic serait confirmé, il resterait plus important pour le Cameroun : circonscrire l'agent pathogène source de cette gangrène, localiser le foyer de cette pandémie sociale en vue de son éventuelle éradication. La question devient aussitôt délicate, car elle exige une introspection que l'on ne semble pas disposé à faire : elle exige que nous nous mettions tous devant notre miroir pour affronter l'image qui nous est renvoyée.

Notre réserve est d'ordre méthodologique. Elle naît de la sérénité avec laquelle l'orateur s'est installé dans une généralisation abusive, comme par un effort certain d'amnésie : affirmer du peuple du Cameroun qu'il est un peuple d'individualistes, c'est en effet s'exposer au sévère reproche de négationnisme. Nier les faits d'histoire fragilise les analyses les plus documentées, celles-ci fussent-elles faites par ce qu'on appelle un peu trop complaisamment " la voix la plus autorisée ". Le Cameroun n'existerait simplement pas comme nation si les Camerounais n'étaient, ou n'avaient été que ce " peuple individualistes " qu'on dit. Certes à l'époque de la lutte pour la conquête de l'indépendance et de la souveraineté, le Cameroun comptait déjà des individualistes préoccupés par leur seul et unique confort personnel. Mais ceux qui ont payé de leur vie pour qu'il y eût une nation nommée Cameroun ne peuvent être méconnus jusqu'à injure. Par le fait des négationnistes précisément, ces Martyrs n'ont pas obtenu que leur sacrifice fût salué et reconnu. Mais s'ils n'ont pas bénéficié d'une digne reconnaissance de la nation, nous doutons qu'ils aient davantage mérité l'impasse que les éclats présidentiels sur l'individualisme tentent de faire à leur sens exceptionnel de l'abnégation.

cinquantenaire_de_la_reunification_buea (123)Le Cameroun ayant connu des filles et des fils aussi dévoués et généreux que désintéressés, il faut qu'il y ait eu une bien profonde fracture morale pour que, soixante ans à peine après leurs sacrifices suprêmes, un Chef de l'Etat du Cameroun indépendant ne puisse présenter à l'opinion nationale et internationale que de fieffés individualistes aussi cupides qu'insatiables. Au négationnisme d'Etat que trahit la méconnaissance des vérités de l'Histoire nationale, s'ajoute la volonté de maquiller les insalubrités ambiantes de notre propre gestion de l'Etat, sous couleur de les stigmatiser. C'est dire en objection à la thèse présidentielle de l'individualisme national qu'elle devra reconsidérer ses assertions ou, si l'on insiste, trouver d'autres arguments pour les généraliser.

Au Cameroun en effet, quelque chose a littéralement mal tourné. La charpente morale de notre édifice national s'est affaissée. L'on peut toujours ergoter sur le moment précis où cet affaissement moral est survenu ; mais notre fracture éthique n'est pas une fiction. Et puisqu'elle est une réalité tangible qu'on peut dater, c'est d'elle qu'il aurait fallu partir pour donner quelque crédit à la thèse présidentielle de l'individualisme. On découvrirait que l'individualisme en question ne saurait être une vertu nationale, puisqu'il est le propre d'une escouade de piranhas dont l'ambition n'aura été que de transformer le Cameroun en une proie à décharner. Les Camerounais ne sauraient donc se définir comme " un peuple d'individualistes ", bien que certains avatars de son histoire politique en aient fait, de naguère à aujourd'hui, un peuple victime d'individualisation.

cinquantenaire_de_la_reunification_buea (18)La thèse de l'individualisation que nous avançons met une sourdine au clairon de la thèse de l'individualisme pour la raison majeure que l'individualisation des Camerounais est un processus dont de nombreux observateurs ont suivi la trame, et dont la traçabilité est possible. Au cours des trente dernières années, le Cameroun comme nation a été progressivement, méthodiquement et activement dégradé en butin. Et malgré leur silence d'indignation et au-delà de leurs flagorneries intéressées, les Camerounais savent qu'ils ont au sommet de l'Etat un spécimen plutôt convaincant de l'individualisme. Ils s'appuient sur le narcissisme managérial qui les aura amenés à constater que le Président de la République a un peu trop souvent oublié de s'oublier un peu. D'aucuns n'hésitent donc plus à conclure que le Président de la République du Cameroun n'est pas L'Incarnation de la rigueur qu'on prétendait dans un livre aujo



--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "ambasbay" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to ambasbay+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.

--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "ambasbay" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to ambasbay+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.

--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "ambasbay" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to ambasbay+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.



--



The thing always happens that you really believe in; and the belief in a thing makes it happen.



--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "ambasbay" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to ambasbay+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.



--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "ambasbay" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to ambasbay+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.




0 comments:

Post a Comment

 
College & Education © 2012 | Designed by