I do not think the article fits into existing conditions of our Country. Everybody knows that many for profit higher education institutes are closing down left and right because there are no takers of their program, on the other hand there are good ones who are making profit too and are still in demand because of quality education imparted by them that makes students competent enough to find their own niche under the sky. Problem being faced by us today is because of sudden unprecedented expansion of the institutes resulting pre-mature engagement and promotion of faculty members effecting the quality of teaching as well as administration. A good student necessarily may not be a good lecturer, a good lecturer without experience may not be a good assistant professor or professor and a good professor may not be a good dean or director without field experience, leadership qualities and many other traits.
Regards
Virendra Goel
From: join_mtc@googlegroups.com [mailto:join_mtc@googlegroups.com] On Behalf Of Prof. Bholanath Dutta
Sent: Sunday, August 31, 2014 7:16 AM
To: join_mtc@googlegroups.com
Subject: [MTC Global] The profit motive is threatening higher education
Why? Because these for-profit institutions often receive hundreds of negative reviews on our website – and at the end of the day, they only seem to care about their financial bottom line.
Free market capitalism argues that competition will drive businesses to offer better and better deals to consumers, while forcing them to place value on the reputation of their product or service.
In the education sector, however, an industry offering billions of dollars in unconditional government grants – and an industry in which for-profit institutions can change their name or location at a moment's notice while all the while blaming students for any lack of success – there is truly very little comparison to the typical practices and boundaries that make up the cornerstone of free market philosophies.
This very corrupt and misleading market is not ‘free’ in any sense – in fact, it more closely resembles the defence-contractor industry in the United States, where companies like Halliburton or Blackwater spring up overnight to win massive no-bid government contracts for things like re-building post-war Iraq.
Interestingly, Caribbean-based offshore investment companies are now offering ‘shelf universities’ for sale alongside shelf corporations – a shameful testament to the massive demand among fly-by-night investors looking to make a quick buck off the higher education sector.
The truth is that treating a college or university primarily as a ‘profitable’ business puts the focus on cutting corners whenever possible and increasing efficiency wherever possible. Ultimately, this approach treats higher education as a globally traded commodity with no safety net.
However, unlike gold, or oil, the ‘product’ of higher education is an intangible, virtual good whose value is completely perceived. And that is exactly why, among self-respecting academics, it will always matter more where and with whom you studied, rather than just merely what you studied.
As the founders of the United States government clearly understood, there are some things that must remain purposefully inefficient, and thoroughly bound by checks and balances, in order to maintain their purpose and value. The education sector should be one of the things.
Author: Richard Hall
An excerpt
Educate, Empower, Elevate
Prof. Bholanath Dutta
Founder, Convener & President
MTC Global & Knowledge Cafe
--
MTC GLOBAL- Educate, Empower, Elevate
---
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Management Teachers Consortium, Global" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to join_mtc+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
No comments:
Post a Comment