Re: [MTC Global] Need urgent advice and guidance!

First of all report the unprofessional conduct of the advocate to the Bar Council with a request to have his registration for practice cancelled on grounds of unethical behaviour. 

Thereafter, like how others have advised, pursue the matter. Most importantly, ensure that you nominate your representative who will work closely with the advocate, attend the court hearings and report the progress to you independent of the lawyer you engage. That is the only way you will have control over the case,else the case will be sold.

Best wishes

Lt Col L Shri Harsha, Retd
Techno Legal Consultant 



From: "'Vijendra Kumar' via Management Teachers Consortium, Global" <join_mtc@googlegroups.com>
To: "join_mtc@googlegroups.com" <join_mtc@googlegroups.com>
Sent: Monday, 25 July 2016 9:32 AM
Subject: Re: [MTC Global] Need urgent advice and guidance!

Dear Varun Sir,
it is unfortunate that you got a wrong advocate, who has vested interests or some thing else (which we do not know). Fighting against him will not solve your problem! (he has done everything legally, but may not be ethical!) Get a new advocate, who could help you in settling the matter with AICTE and apply for renewal.
One of my uncle, who is a senior staff in a high court said that a lawyer has single focus: Get as much money from client as possible!
Even one of my relative's divorce case, our lawyer got money from opposite party and settle the matter (remember that all those lawyers are friends/colleagues. They have tea/lunch together!!)
You could approach media (you have to pay them so money!), supreme court as well as PMO.
But keep your focus on getting the renewal and run the show.
Regards,
Prof. Vijendra Kumar S.K.
Assistant Professor & Counseling Psychologist,
Centre for Counseling and Career Guidance
PES University, Bangalore.


On Monday, July 25, 2016 8:46 AM, Parameshwar P Iyer <piyeriisc@gmail.com> wrote:


Dear Professor Varun Arya,

Please do two things:

1. Take the matter to the Supreme Court, after hiring an incorruptible lawyer Fortunately, a few of them are still around (Harish Salve, Ram/ Mahesh Jethmalani. et al)

2. Get hold of Mr. Arnab Goswami of Times Now. If he says that "the country wants to know" the TRUTH, believe me, the country will want to know the TRUTH

Best wishes and regards.

Parameshwar P. Iyer

P.S. If you need my pro-bono, voluntary help in either of the above steps, or a=in any other manner, please do not hesitate to contact me.



Prof Parameshwar P. Iyer, PhD (California), PRS
Chairman, Office of Intellectual Property and
Technology Licensing (IP TeL) and
Faculty, Department of Management Studies
INDIAN INSTITUTE OF SCIENCE (IISc)
BANGALORE - 560 012 - INDIA

Ph: 9180- 22933267, 23600712, 22932037, 22932038 (IP TeL),  23602278 (R), 98861 02448 (M)
Fax:9180- 2360 4534, 2360 0712

email: <piyer@mgmt.iisc.ernet.in>, <piyeriisc@gmail.com>

URL: <http://mgmt.iisc.ernet.in/~piyer>

On Sun, Jul 24, 2016 at 10:12 PM, Varun Arya <aimvarun@gmail.com> wrote:
Boxbe This message is eligible for Automatic Cleanup! (aimvarun@gmail.com) Add cleanup rule | More info

Dear Friends & Well-wishers

I urgently need some advice and guidance in a critically important and extremely sensitive matter.

As many of you are aware, in view of our firm belief that education by definition is based on ethics, we have been fighting a number of battles with many vested interests within and outside the government for the last around two decades.

One of the ongoing battles we have been fighting is with regulatory body All India Council for Technical Education (AICTE). On 30 June 2009, we had got the AICTE approval on merit alone after a long struggle of nine years and the High Powered Committee which scrutinised our case and strongly recommended it had said in its report that ours was a role model institute of the country and great injustice had been done to it.

In view of our having declined admission to son of a CBI officer, it got after us to make a fraudulent case and wrote to AICTE not to give us approval renewal. The vested interests within AICTE acted on it and refused to give us approval renewal. We filed a case in Rajasthan High Court and the judge gave an order restraining AICTE from acting on CBI letter. However, AICTE refused to give credence to this Rajasthan High Court order. Later we also got an order from the Chief Information Commissioner of India, in a second appeal filed by us wherein CBI said that they did not find anything against us and therefore, they had closed the case. This CIC order was also submitted to AICTE but of no avail.

I had three meetings with AICTE Chairman but he refused to heed to Rajasthan High Court and CIC orders. When I told him that I would file contempt of court case, he said that I could do whatever I wanted and AICTE knew how to manage the advocates and courts.

I filed a contempt of court case against AICTE Chairman and was feeling great having done so. However, no progress was being made in this. One day AICTE advocate happened to meet me in court premises and he surprisingly told me that everything about the said case had been settled with our advocate. I immediately got hold of the entire case file from our advocate and was shocked to see that our advocate had indeed withdrawn the contempt of court case without taking our permission and did not have the courtesy to even inform us about it.

Notwithstanding the above, we were still pursuing the matter against AICTE and had got another enquiry instituted against AICTE. During this, when the enquiry agency asked us about CBI matter, we told it that we had got a restraining order from Rajasthan High Court. To this, we were surprised to know from the enquiry agency that the said order had been vacated. I immediately got the case file from our advocate and was shocked to find that the restraining order had indeed been vacated. AICTE made an application to court to vacate the order, which our advocate neither informed us, nor submitted any reply to it and nor contested it.

When our Institute people confronted the said advocate with the above two matters, he said that he had our Vakalatnama (power of attorney) which he was empowered to use and he had used.

The above is clearly a serious breach of trust, cheating, fraud and betrayal of a client.

This advocate is politically very well connected and is aspiring to be a High Court judge.

--
The views expressed are individual and not necessarily MTC Global also share the same views.
---
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Management Teachers Consortium, Global" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to join_mtc+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.


--
The views expressed are individual and not necessarily MTC Global also share the same views.
---
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Management Teachers Consortium, Global" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to join_mtc+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.


--
The views expressed are individual and not necessarily MTC Global also share the same views.
---
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Management Teachers Consortium, Global" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to join_mtc+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.


Unknown ● Sunday, July 24, 2016

0 comments:

Post a Comment

Subscribe to: Post Comments (Atom)
 
College & Education © 2012 | Designed by