Re: A Reply to Dr. Susunji’s RE-UNIFICATION: CLARIFICATION NOTE

Amen to that, and I see sense in your articles.

On 6/30/12, louis egbe <louis_egbe@yahoo.co.uk> wrote:
> Hello Martin,
>
> I am not sure many are aware what Dr. Susunji  is doing. I think he should
> be met with equal and firing intellectual power.  This struggle will never
> be considered over until the oppressors and their agents are defeated and
> freedom attained. Dr. Susunji has declared open intellectual war to spread
> propaganda so as to persuade many to join his "Presidential" bid while
> dissuading our people from joining the cause. This should never be allowed.
>
> He is free to become the President of LRC but NOT at the expense of our
> people's cause.  If he campaigns just on LRC agenda, he will be left alone.
> However, I will not let him on this one. I am writing another article to
> dismiss this propaganda of deceit.
> It should be made clear that this is an intellectual war.
>
> Mbua
>
>
> --- On Sat, 30/6/12, Martin Yembe <mfyembe@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>
> From: Martin Yembe <mfyembe@gmail.com>
> Subject: Re: A Reply to Dr. Susunji's RE-UNIFICATION: CLARIFICATION NOTE
> To: ambasbay@googlegroups.com
> Date: Saturday, 30 June, 2012, 17:51
>
>
> I have warned all those transforming the liberation struggle into an
> intellectual debate to beware. We can NOT be fooled ANYMORE. Thanks,
> Mola Mbua for this piece, but I dare state that no matter how many
> thesis are presented on whether or not there was (re)unification is
> not our point of interest now as to the fact that a people want to be
> free. Those who want to remain in LRC are free to, without dragging us
> along. I am speaking from my soul!!!
> Shey MF Yembe
>
> On 6/30/12, thomas sama achoa <samatom2007@yahoo.fr> wrote:
>> Dr Louis Egbe even the damn thing that Ahidjo called a Federation in
>> September 1961 before the intention
>> of the Southern Cameroonian people was made in October that is a month
>> later
>> was wrong.
>> See why it was wrong let me bring Nigeria into play. Nigeria as an entity
>> started as a federated state of three
>> states that does not mean that three states were independent entities
>> with
>> International Boundries as was the case
>>
>> of the Southern Cameroons, what happened in LRDC in September 1961 is
>> just
>> the same like the Nigerian people
>>
>> deed by declaring a federated state from the start, so  Ahijo's
>> Federation
>> does not include the Southern Cameroons into the damn thing
>>
>> what a heck is Dokta Susungi trying to tell me here? It is because of the
>> likes of Dokta Susungi that we are where we are
>> today for he dokta saw this thing coming but he failed to raised an
>> objection today we the young once are suffering and
>> scattered all over the world like sheeps without a shepherd and enstead
>> of
>> him appologising to us he is there running his
>> mouth about nonsense is he insane or what is this all about?
>>
>>
>>
>> ________________________________
>>  From: louis egbe <louis_egbe@yahoo.co.uk>
>> To: camnetwork@yahoogroups.com; ambasbay@yahoogroups.com;
>> SobaAmerica@yahoogroups.com; SOBA76@yahoogroups.com
>> Cc: ambasbay@googlegroups.com
>> Sent: Saturday, June 30, 2012 2:17 PM
>> Subject: A Reply to Dr. Susunji's RE-UNIFICATION: CLARIFICATION NOTE
>>
>>
>> Saturday, 30 June 2012
>> A Reply to Dr. Susunji's RE-UNIFICATION: CLARIFICATION NOTE
>>
>> I was interested in Hon Chief Ayah's internet-circulated posting, 29 June
>> 2012, which clearly stated that there is no legally binding document
>> deposited at the UN, as required by international law enshrined in the UN
>> Charter that created the so-called Union between the Southern Cameroons
>> and
>> La Republique du Cameroun. Hon. Ayah was correct. However, it seems Dr.
>> Susunji, in his own rebuttal article equally published yesterday, 29 June
>> 2012, in various Cameroon internet fora is stating that Hon Paul Ayah's
>> is
>> misleading and that there is or was a kind of legally binding agreement.
>> Dr.Susunji is totally incorrect and his article is grossly misleading as
>> the
>> following analysis and argument will reveal in this essay.
>>
>> In the first place, if there was any "Treaty", then that "Treaty" has
>> been
>> violated since Ahidjo abrogated the Treaty in 1972 by violating the
>> Federal
>> constitution that brought to birth the de facto Federation in 1961. The
>> Federal Constitution which came to force in September 1961 could not
>> possibly be classified as a Treaty since the only signatory in the
>> document
>> was President Ahidjo......
>>
>> Read the full article in: http://louis-mbua.blogspot.co.uk/
>