Second Menu

Saturday, June 30, 2012

Re: A Reply to Dr. Susunji’s RE-UNIFICATION: CLARIFICATION NOTE

Hello Martin,

 

I am not sure many are aware what Dr. Susunji  is doing. I think he should be met with equal and firing intellectual power.  This struggle will never be considered over until the oppressors and their agents are defeated and freedom attained. Dr. Susunji has declared open intellectual war to spread propaganda so as to persuade many to join his "Presidential" bid while dissuading our people from joining the cause. This should never be allowed.

He is free to become the President of LRC but NOT at the expense of our people's cause.  If he campaigns just on LRC agenda, he will be left alone. However, I will not let him on this one. I am writing another article to dismiss this propaganda of deceit.

It should be made clear that this is an intellectual war.

 

Mbua



--- On Sat, 30/6/12, Martin Yembe <mfyembe@gmail.com> wrote:

From: Martin Yembe <mfyembe@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: A Reply to Dr. Susunji's RE-UNIFICATION: CLARIFICATION NOTE
To: ambasbay@googlegroups.com
Date: Saturday, 30 June, 2012, 17:51

I have warned all those transforming the liberation struggle into an
intellectual debate to beware. We can NOT be fooled ANYMORE. Thanks,
Mola Mbua for this piece, but I dare state that no matter how many
thesis are presented on whether or not there was (re)unification is
not our point of interest now as to the fact that a people want to be
free. Those who want to remain in LRC are free to, without dragging us
along. I am speaking from my soul!!!
Shey MF Yembe

On 6/30/12, thomas sama achoa <samatom2007@yahoo.fr> wrote:
> Dr Louis Egbe even the damn thing that Ahidjo called a Federation in
> September 1961 before the intention
> of the Southern Cameroonian people was made in October that is a month later
> was wrong.
> See why it was wrong let me bring Nigeria into play. Nigeria as an entity
> started as a federated state of three
> states that does not mean that three states were independent entities with
> International Boundries as was the case
>
> of the Southern Cameroons, what happened in LRDC in September 1961 is just
> the same like the Nigerian people
>
> deed by declaring a federated state from the start, so  Ahijo's Federation
> does not include the Southern Cameroons into the damn thing
>
> what a heck is Dokta Susungi trying to tell me here? It is because of the
> likes of Dokta Susungi that we are where we are
> today for he dokta saw this thing coming but he failed to raised an
> objection today we the young once are suffering and
> scattered all over the world like sheeps without a shepherd and enstead of
> him appologising to us he is there running his
> mouth about nonsense is he insane or what is this all about?
>
>
>
> ________________________________
>  From: louis egbe <louis_egbe@yahoo.co.uk>
> To: camnetwork@yahoogroups.com; ambasbay@yahoogroups.com;
> SobaAmerica@yahoogroups.com; SOBA76@yahoogroups.com
> Cc: ambasbay@googlegroups.com
> Sent: Saturday, June 30, 2012 2:17 PM
> Subject: A Reply to Dr. Susunji's RE-UNIFICATION: CLARIFICATION NOTE
>
>
> Saturday, 30 June 2012
> A Reply to Dr. Susunji's RE-UNIFICATION: CLARIFICATION NOTE
>
> I was interested in Hon Chief Ayah's internet-circulated posting, 29 June
> 2012, which clearly stated that there is no legally binding document
> deposited at the UN, as required by international law enshrined in the UN
> Charter that created the so-called Union between the Southern Cameroons and
> La Republique du Cameroun. Hon. Ayah was correct. However, it seems Dr.
> Susunji, in his own rebuttal article equally published yesterday, 29 June
> 2012, in various Cameroon internet fora is stating that Hon Paul Ayah's is
> misleading and that there is or was a kind of legally binding agreement.
> Dr.Susunji is totally incorrect and his article is grossly misleading as the
> following analysis and argument will reveal in this essay.
>
> In the first place, if there was any "Treaty", then that "Treaty" has been
> violated since Ahidjo abrogated the Treaty in 1972 by violating the Federal
> constitution that brought to birth the de facto Federation in 1961. The
> Federal Constitution which came to force in September 1961 could not
> possibly be classified as a Treaty since the only signatory in the document
> was President Ahidjo......
>
> Read the full article in: http://louis-mbua.blogspot.co.uk/

No comments:

Post a Comment