.....EVEN when I was an advocate for LEGALISM, I engaged it knowing legalism could ONLY go so far!
....Legalism allows us to simultaneously do several things in the background as we pursue our cause with even more vigor in the foreground. It would allow us SHOW CAUSE, provide JUSTIFICATION, and hopefully gather the much needed strategic SUPPORT, etc etc.. Essentially it allows us to make a non emotional but convincing case for restoring the independence of AMBAZONIA to anyone who wants to listen within a minute!
**PEOPLE DO NOT HAVE TIME, NOR WOULD TAKE YOU AS A SERIOUS PERSON, LISTENING TO COMPLAINTS ABOUT BEING MARGINALIZED**.
Equally, People easily forget that the over 60 years of our virtual acquiescence ((guilt by association)) is what the rest of the world sees everyday not the legal victories we have or could have. The acquiescence accusation is made so easy by how efficient our current emancipation quest conducts pan-CAMEROONISM.
As of now, the victim of the most vicious form of RECOLONIZATION still haven't figured out that they are a recolonized people all thanks to their politicians continuous rejection of the elements of power to a people: their IDENTITY and its accompanying NATIONALISM!
To take back our country and regain our freedom would require that we FORCE Cameroon out of it!
POWER which we do not currently have, which we have never had, is what we must have before we can "elicit compliance from the recalcitrant" Cameroon!
So much TIME and energies is being WASTED crying over spilt milk!
IT CAN BE SUMMARIZED THAT BAD THINGS HAPPENED TO OUR PEOPLE THEN, AND HAS CONTINUED TO HAPPEN NOW, BECAUSE OF THE CONTINUOUS FAILURE OF THEIR LEADERSHIP TO PURSUE POWER POLITICS! At the level of the sovereign state, Identity and its accompanying nationalism is how to detonate power into a people's polity!
Therefore the need to RESET--to REFOCUS-- to RELAUNCH can never be over overemphasized! Just as it can even be argued that wealth of LEGALISM provides us the knowledge to know not only its limits, but the limits of any other logical alternative. This maybe why people say "KNOWLEDGE IS POWER"! We should by now have the knowledge to pick amongst alternatives only the one BEST option!
As AMBAZONIANS we are people who do not DOUBT the JUSTNESS of the cause. As AMBAZONIANS we are people who are supposed to be always LASER FOCUSED on pursuing the next best thing. As AMBAZONIANS we are principled-Baer people who support BEST PRACTICES when we see one and who unfailingly would use it when we need one.
Reason why the burden is on us AMBAZONIANS to now pursue the REALISTIC STRATEGY that would bring EFFECTIVE POWER to bear on the CAUSE.
Maybe someone OUT THERE is pursuing realistic POWER-Based politicking. By all means just do it! At this juncture the usually unsuspecting MASSES WHO ARE NOT SUPPOSED TO KNOW WHAT REALLY HAPPENED THEN, NOW OR TOMORROW, can only hope that their POLITICAL REPRESENTATIVE (elites) have REALISTICALLY thought out the strategy they are currently pursuing!
IF ONLY ELITES PURSUING ANY STRATEGY CAN BE NIMBLE ENOUGH TO SWITCH COURSE WHEN ITS APPARENT THAT ITS NOT WORKING, OR HUMBLE ENOUGH TO ADMIT THEIR PAST MISTAKES WHEN ALL THE EVIDENCES HAVE REVEALED ITS PAUCITY?
What the EMANCIPATION QUEST desperately needs today is the medical equivalent of a BY PASS surgery which must be done before "irreversible brain death" take hold from the current pan-cameroon asphyxiation!
The very logical AMBAZONIAN LEGAL TACTIC REMAINS UNIMPEACHABLE! But now as AMBAZONIANS-- people who has been the logical pioneer force in everything realistic, it's time we LASER FOCUS solely on just how to get POWER into the emancipation quest!
It can be done because it has been done before by others! And because we know "best practices" dictates that successful revolutions are those executed with the requirement of power secured as its integral part of a strategy, we as AMBAZONIANS have found that source of power!
It's right there for us to pick and use: our very own unique AMBAZONIAN identity and its accompanying nationalism!
AMBAZONIANS should now concentrate all their efforts at securing POWER. The rest of the emancipation quest will follow as they did in the past. We must continue to reach out to ALL PEOPLES ( AMBAZONIANS, Cameroonians, and anyone who gives us a hearing ) about the efficacy of this "peace through strength" strategy.
Edwin Ngang
Sent from my iPhone
--Dear AchamThere are more in stock for us. When one goes through records of;-United Nations (UN) i.e Fourth Committee, Sixth Committee, General Assembly)-International Law Commission (ILC)-International Court of Justice; one will notice that these highest international law making bodies had talked of a Federation Republic of the Cameroons here and there in their records but we are the very people who are refusing to find out why? All we have been doing is looking at personality politics and not standing in principles.We are at a stage that every one is talking about action but less than 0.5% of us really know how we got into the problem in the first place. If we truly know how we entered the problem then it will be easy to find a way out. If we know, it will help us know who exactly is to be targeted are why. I here confess to our people that 99.5% do not really know how we got to where we find ourselves. The 0.5% that know are never taken seriously or being heard because we do or like personality politics and not politics based on principles first before personality.From the volumes of records on the Trust Territory of British Cameroons, if we know what part the our leaders (Foncha, Muna and Endeley) did during the decolonization process of our country we will know how to focus are fight. Some will say Endeley's predict about joining with Cameroun was to be bad and it has come to pass --yet we failed to find out how Endeley proposed alternative of joining but Nigeria would have been good. Some will say Muna said our independence is on the ground, it is only for us to bend down and pick. He did not tell us that he told the whole world through the General Assembly on the 17 October 1961 (just 16 days after 1 October 1961) that a perfect Federation Republic was in place. Some will say that Foncha cried during AAC I conference in Buea but he did not tell us that he had a secret deal with Ahidjo not to strictly implement the Plebiscite Pact references in 1608XV paragraph (5) in return of his political post of vice president in the fake Federal Republic Cameroon. The British knew this and stayed silence.These our leaders did not tell us that, they did not demand for complete independence for the Southern Cameroons --their parties being the first and second majority parties in Southern Cameroons at the time. The voices of real nationalist like Kale, Manga and Traditional rulers party (Fons) at the Manfe Conference that were in the minority but were for total independence for southern Cameroons on its own were never stated at the UN when the question of our future was to be considered. It is on records Foncha and Endeley got the Southern Cameroons parliament to give them powers to speak for people Southern Cameroons. It is records that only their contrary parties ideas were tabled at the UN for consideration. The complete independent voice was never mention at the UN when the political leaders of the Southern Cameroons went to the UN after Manfe conference.One important fact we must always is the Trusteeship Agreement and UN Article 76b made mentioned very clearly that the termination of the Trusteeship will be according to the wishes of the people. All through the process, the wishes of our people that was handed to Foncha and Endeley was above the United Nations and United Kingdom. So, what ever our wishes was to be the UN and Britain was to go by it. Our leaders did not have voice as to what our future would be for consideration. Their differences as what we want became so messy that foreign countries were worried. It was are leaders that were so desperate to go with Nigeria or Cameroun. Even at a time, Cameroun made it clear to the UN that it will never allow any constitutional experts to enter her country to implement paragraph 5 of 1608 XV because the UN has no legal right to dictate to a sovereign nation. Cameroun voted against 1608XV, yet our people were till bend to join Cameroun as if we were cursed. It was the wishes of people that British and the UN followed. From UN records it is legally clear that after vote of Resolution 1608XV (64 infavor, 23 against and 10 abstention) the UN main objective of Article 76b INDEPENDENCE was achieved for the British Cameroons in accordance to to the wishes of the people. It is clearly seen from UN records that the implementation of paragraph 5 of 1608XV (Terms of the Plebiscite Pact which was Federation) was considered to be internal affairs of two sovereign independent states. Take note that the question of Northern Cameroons is not touch here, because they too have their own way. The records are very clear.After United Republic of Cameroon law 84/01 was passed, these our indirectly ganged up with Cameroun (Paul Biyia) against the Ambazonian Restoration Council under Gorji Dinka's leadership when Dr. Fonlong handed to over. Instead of looking at principles that a person stands for first, we are are looking but for personality. Our people have been and are still the very ones that are keeping us under occupation because, they and their families, are the ones benefiting from it. Are we sure the transfer of the CDC headquarter to Yaounde is without the knowledge of our people?I wish we all take some time to read these two international legal interpretation on how the British Cameroons termination of the trusteeship is viewed within international law. We do not needs to seek for treaty of union but just to tell the UN that the Federation Republic of Cameroon end in 1984 period.Taking action based on perfect understanding of legality is the best way. The two must go together -- but then are we there yet?MANAmbazonianDownUnder
From: Julius Acham <achamj07@gmail.com>
To: ambasbay <ambasbay@googlegroups.com>
Sent: Monday, 4 July 2016, 12:31
Subject: BREAKING: COULD THIS MEAN THERE WAS A UNION? MUNA"S DELEGATION TO THE UN IN 1961
--Could this mean there was a Union? Could this be the reason LRC, UK and UN are silent about our cases?. Could this be the reason the UN said our case is closed and the UK said we rounded up the UNION?This makes Divine's suggestion of Foumban II useless.This release by HRH Gorji Dinka must be taken seriously. Suggests that we focus on 1984 and Law of creation and dissolution of States, to win hands down.--JAWWW.AMBAZONIA.ORG- ONGOING CIVIL DEFENSE FORCE SIGN UP
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "ambasbay" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to ambasbay+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "ambasbay" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to ambasbay+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
0 comments:
Post a Comment