Second Menu

▼

Saturday, April 29, 2017

Re: [MTC Global] COMPARATIVE STUDY OF RANKING PARAMETERS: QS , TIMES, SANGHAI AND NIRF RANKINS

Thank you Prof. Dutta,

NIRF RANKING, INDIA looks better in criteria-vise.

SANGHAI RANKING seems to be beyond reach of Indian Institutions.

Teaching – the learning environment, should have been given more weight-age in Times ranking.


Warm Regards


Dr. Pious Thomas

Director, Academic

Bharata Mata Institute of Management (BMIM)

Thrikkakara, Ernakulum, Kerala

Mobile India: +91 7591915902

https://www.facebook.com/piousskillsforsuccess

Website: www.skillsforsuccess.in


On Sun, Apr 30, 2017 at 10:51 AM, Prof. Bholanath Dutta <bnath.dutta@gmail.com> wrote:

COMPARATIVE STUDY OF RANKING PARAMETERS: QS , TIMES, SANGHAI AND NIRF RANKINS

 

Methodology of QS World University Rankings[16]

Indicator

Weighting

Elaboration

Academic peer review

·         40%

Based on an internal global academic survey

Faculty/Student ratio

·         20%

A measurement of teaching commitment

Citations per faculty

·         20%

A measurement of research impact

Employer reputation

·         10%

Based on a survey on graduate employers

International student ratio

·         5%

A measurement of the diversity of the student community

International staff ratio

·         5%

A measurement of the diversity of the academic staff

 

Times higher education ranking

 

Overall indicator

Individual indicator

Percentage weighting

Industry Income – innovation

·         Research income from industry (per academic staff)

·         2.5%

International diversity

·         Ratio of international to domestic staff

·         Ratio of international to domestic students

·         3%

·         2%

Teaching – the learning environment

·         Reputational survey (teaching)

·         PhDs awards per academic

·         Undergrad. admitted per academic

·         Income per academic

·         PhDs/undergraduate degrees awarded

·         15%

·         6%

·         4.5%

·         2.25%

·         2.25%

Research – volume, income and reputation

·         Reputational survey (research)

·         Research income (scaled)

·         Papers per research and academic staff

·         Public research income/ total research income

·         19.5%

·         5.25%

·         4.5%

·         0.75%

Citations – research influence

·         Citation impact (normalised average citation per paper)

·         32.5%

 

SANGHAI RANKING

ARWU methodology

Criterion

Indicator

Code

Weighting

Source

Quality of education

Alumni as Nobel laureates & Fields Medalists

Alumni

10%

Official websites of Nobel Laureates & Fields Medalists[Note 1]

Quality of faculty

Staff as Nobel Laureates & Fields Medalists

Highly cited researchers in 21 broad subject categories

Award

HiCi

20%

20%

Official websites of Nobel Laureates & Fields Medalists[Note 1]

Thomson Reuters' survey of highly cited researchers[Note 1]

Research output

Papers published in Nature and SciencePapers indexed in Science Citation Index-expanded and Social Science Citation Index

N&S

PUB

·         20%

·         20%

Citation index

Jump up^ Not applicable to institutions specialized in humanities and social sciences whose N&S scores are relocated to other indicators.

 

NIRF RANKING, INDIA

Engineering, management, pharmacy and architecture institutions

 

Parameters

Category A
institutions

Category B
institutions

Teaching, learning and resources (TLR)

0.30

0.30

Research, professional practice and collaborative performance (RPC)

0.30

0.20

Graduation outcome (GO)

0.15

0.25

Outreach and inclusivity (OI)

0.15

0.15

Perception (PR)

0.10

0.10

 

 

Universities and colleges

Parameters

Universities

Colleges

Teaching, learning and resources (TLR)

0.30

0.40

Research, productivity, impact and IPR (RPII)

0.40

0.20

Graduation outcome (GO)

0.05

0.15

Outreach and inclusivity (OI)

0.15

0.15

Perception (PR)

0.10

0.10

 


​


--
EDUCATE, EMPOWER, ELEVATE
Prof. Bholanath Dutta
Founder &  President 
MTC Global: A Global Think Tank in 
Higher Educaiton Education, ISO 9001: 2008
Partner: UN Global Compact I UN Academic Impact

 

--
The views expressed are individual and not necessarily MTC Global also share the same views. To unsubscribe from the group , please send an email to join_mtc@googlegroups.com and write the heading as 'Unsubscribe'. Immediate action will be taken.
---
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Management Teachers Consortium, Global" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to join_mtc+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

--
The views expressed are individual and not necessarily MTC Global also share the same views. To unsubscribe from the group , please send an email to join_mtc@googlegroups.com and write the heading as 'Unsubscribe'. Immediate action will be taken.
---
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Management Teachers Consortium, Global" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to join_mtc+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
at

No comments:

Post a Comment