Re: [ACEsthetics] Re: PANX vx. FMX Question

Erin,
Good philosophy, but check with your ins. person. We found better reimbursement charging for the PAN and BW rather than the FMX. 
Craig

On Tue, Jan 29, 2013 at 12:44 PM, Erin Elliott <erinelliottdds@gmail.com> wrote:


The endodontist I refer to once asked me why my practice had so many internal resorptions that were caught early.  In fact I think I was one of two dentists that ever referred them.  My answer? "Because we take an FMX on every patient and I look for them."  I think too much is lost with just pano and BWs.  We take FMX and pano every 3-5 years.  We bill out FMX and write off the pano.  It's a no-brainer for me as I want to be as comprehensive as I can. 
Erin E. Elliott, DDS
Post Falls, ID

--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "ACEsthetics" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to acesthetics+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com.
To post to this group, send email to acesthetics@googlegroups.com.
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/acesthetics?hl=en.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
 
 



--
Craig C. Callen, D.D.S. & Associates
552 South Trimble Road
Mansfield, Ohio 44906
419-756-0188
www.DrCallen.com
Cutting Edge Seminars

--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "ACEsthetics" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to acesthetics+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com.
To post to this group, send email to acesthetics@googlegroups.com.
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/acesthetics?hl=en.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
 
 

0 comments:

Post a Comment

 
College & Education © 2012 | Designed by