Re: STOP ALL NEGOTIATIONS NOW! - ULTIMATUM GRANTED

Dear Compatriots of West Cameroon.

The truth about 2016 was that 31st December 2016 was the deadline to
decide if La Republique du Cameroun recognizes the Union in any Level
as it holds on National Unity, One and Indivisible Cameroon but Mr,
Paul Biya the President of La Republique played with words like a
Literature Teacher in his Classroom.
Nevertheless he made mention of those who fought for National Unity
meaning there was an agenda that brought the two entities together.
Today is the 1st of January 2017 and I want to speech as a Civil
Society Consultant from Ndian Division in West Cameroon that time has
come when this issue is no More Lawyers and Teachers of the English
Speaking Cameroonians.
I thought the Cameroon Anglophone Civil Society Consortium was really
a Civil Society Driven Platform not knowing it was for Lawyers and
Teachers Trade Unions. Why then do we keep on decieving ouselves with
deceitful words like "Civil Society" when its a professional
Consortium, unrepresented and underrepresented by concerned actors.
To this note, I am of full bid that The Consortium should no longer
Represent the West Cameroon since the issue is no more Teachers and
Lawyers Concern.
We are all Aware that the Bishops of South West and North West Region
wrote a letter to the La Republique President who finally termed it as
a group of "Manipulated Extremists".
Leadership is what we Need Now not Professional Representation. Let
the Ambazonia Administration Called for all Political Parties, Civil
Society, Religious Leaders, Trade Unions and Opinion Leaders in West
Cameroon so that we can meet in Buea and then to Bamenda to discuss
issues and draft Memos to Submit at the United Nations, Africa Union
and other International Institutions Against La Republique du
Cameroun.
La Republique du Cameroun is looking forward to extinct the Culture,
People and Leaders of La republique with its Brutal Forces of Law and
Order which he reiterated in his Speech.
Before they continue to use the Consortium as Spokesperson of the West
Cameroon People, we have to first of All Use the available
Communication Means to Address a Final letter of Self Administration
with Copies sent to the United Nations, African Union, Diplomatic
Missions and to International Courts for Illegal Occupation of the
West Cameroon,, Torture, Detention, Murder and Disappearance to West
Cameroon Leaders that La republique is targeting to do or Die.
Finally, We have to send Letters to our Chiefs and Fons to Stop
attending meetings called for by La Republique Administrators at all
levels. I will draft and circulate letters to all Chiefs, Mayors,
Parliamentarians, Pastors and other Community Based Organization
leaders to this effect but before doing this I must be certain that
the Consortium has been reorganized to include all Community Leaders
or the Ambazonia government Officially Making Physical Communiques
indicating their Presence to Preside over Meetings towards the
Solution we require.
There is in Compatibility Between La Republique du Cameroun and West
Cameroun. Biya Made his point very Clear and did no Mention of his
intentions to embrace Federation in terms of the National Unity he
Assumes. Ndian Division shall not continue to be a Manner Field for
Perpetrators and I will do all even to PAY with my BLOOD to Secure the
Borders of Ndian Division which Mr. Biya is planning to divide and
make Regions out of it!!! Divide and Rule even in his grave near
moments.
Let us Prove to Him that There is Nothing Else to Discuss with Him
without the United nations, Britain Etc...

Itoe Francis Ebongue
Civil Society Consultants
Tel. +237 65113 8883


On 1/1/17, Office of the Secretary of State - Ambazonia National
Governing Council <sccs_scis@outlook.com> wrote:
> STOP ALL NEGOTIATIONS NOW!
>
> 1. Members of the Consortium/Teachers and Lawyers seem to have tasted
> power (if we may so say) and found it sweet. They appear to want to
> constitute themselves into the spokespersons of the Southern Cameroons
> cause. But their position is completely untenable. On the one hand they fear
> the word "independence" and want to be seen to be acting as representatives
> of the so-called Anglophone "sub-system" within Republique du Cameroun.
> They will not also use the term "Southern Cameroons". They keep talking of
> "Anglophone problem", federation and marginalisation, when the whole
> Southern Cameroons public is talking of colonisation, annexation and
> complete independence from Republique du Cameroun! They say they are not
> politicians, but have put on the table the question of return to federation,
> which is highly political!
> 2. How can the Consortium/Lawyers and Teachers represent the Southern
> Cameroons when they want to be seen as belonging to a sub-system within
> Republique and acting within the rules of Republique, while the rest of the
> population is insisting on complete separation from the oppressors? How can
> they represent the people when they are insisting on making their problem a
> domestic affair of Republique du Cameroun, while the Southern Cameroons
> problem is pre-eminently an international matter; a boundary dispute; a
> matter of the illegal occupation of the territory of the Southern Cameroons
> by Republique du Cameroun?
> 3. Are they trying to prove something? What do they want to prove through
> the talks that has not been proven a thousand times over within the last 55
> years? Do they want to show that Republique is of bad faith? That it cannot
> grant their basic demands? What exactly do they want to prove, and to who,
> by engaging in these talks? If that is what they want to prove, then indeed
> they have been living in another world, because there is a mountain of
> evidence to show the bad faith of Republique; its colonisation of the
> Southern Cameroons; its determined and premeditated efforts to destroy the
> people of the Southern Cameroons. Republique has so far refused the
> constructive dialogue proposed by the African Commission on Human and
> Peoples' Rights; it continues to suppress Southern Cameroonian freedom of
> speech and assembly; to kill and murder our children; kidnap and take them
> to its own country, and so on. What kind of evidence are we still looking
> for?
> 4. The people of Southern Cameroons do not want speeches and communiqués
> from lawyers/teachers. We want them to answer the questions we are asking
> them. Only clear answers to these questions will assure us that something is
> not terribly wrong with what they are doing. And we fear that something will
> go very, very wrong!
> 5. By going into those talks, we have voluntarily lent ourselves to be
> used by Republique for its propaganda. Republique has all the instruments of
> propaganda; we don't have any. It will tell the world that our problems are
> already being addressed in the ongoing negotiations, or even that they have
> been solved. What will you do?
> 6. Are there going to be two sets of dialogue: one for the teachers and
> lawyers and after that the other one for the rest of Southern Cameroons to
> talk about the withdrawal of Republique du Cameroun from the Southern
> Cameroons territory?
> 7. Since the talks by teachers and lawyers are entirely a domestic affair
> of Republique du Cameroun, will they be capable of addressing the issue of
> the withdrawal of Republique du Cameroun from the territory of the Southern
> Cameroons?
> 8. Let us say that the ongoing talks by lawyers and teachers with
> Republique fail. What next? Do the lawyers/teachers now say that Southern
> Cameroonian politicians and liberation movements should take over? Do the
> lawyers/teachers now accept to sit down together with various liberation
> movements to chart the way forward? So why have the lawyers and teachers not
> seen the need up till now to sit down with the various liberation movements?
> Where do the lawyers/teachers take the evidence of the failure for further
> action?
> 9. If Republique grants all the demands, including federation, what
> happens? Do the lawyers and teachers now accept to enlarge the negotiations
> to include various Southern Cameroons liberation movements? Do they withdraw
> and pass the negotiations on to them or what? Who has determined the kind of
> federation that the lawyers/teachers are talking about? Do the lawyers and
> teachers simply ignore the various Southern Cameroons liberation movements
> and continue with the negotiations? Let them tell us their game plan, for
> goodness sake!
> 10. I have not yet considered the looming danger of the Lawyers/Teachers
> compromising the struggle, whether knowingly or unknowingly. But it is
> there, since they have voluntarily decided to tempt the devil by going into
> these negotiations whose agenda, terms and composition are dictated entirely
> by the colonial regime.
> 11. The minimum condition for any dialogue with Republique du Cameroun
> have always been that such dialogue will be accepted by Southern Cameroons
> only in the presence of a neutral international body and that the withdrawal
> of Republique du Cameroun from the Southern Cameroons territory must be on
> the agenda. All other issues will follow from these.
> 12. Finally, let us say the lawyers/teachers succeed in the sense that La
> Republique grants their demands, we come to the herculean task: by what
> means do they guarantee that La Republique will ever respect its agreements?
> La Republique has violated every single agreement it made concerning the
> Southern Cameroons, even those made at the UN. So let the lawyers/teachers
> tell us how they intend to safeguard any agreement reached with Republique
> du Cameroun! This is one of the reasons why all right-thinking Southern
> Cameroonians rule out completely any hope of a one-Cameroon formula! We
> simply cannot accept to share one space of existence with Republique du
> Cameroun, period. Our refusal to share one space of existence with
> Republique is not simply linked to their complete inability to honour any
> agreement with us. It is first and foremost linked to the game of numbers,
> which ensures, no matter what laws you make, that we will be a perpetual
> minority in everything if we ever join our country with their own. A family
> of two going to join a family of twenty can never hope to get a breathing
> space.
> 13. In view of the foregoing, we are calling on the lawyers/teachers to
> suspend and completely stop all negotiations with the colonial regime. They
> can only help obscure our problems and create confusion among southern
> Cameroons actors. Worst of all, we give the foolish impression that our
> problems are capable of being solved within any one-Cameroon formula. That
> is simply impossible!!!!!
>
> The State Dept.
> Southern Cameroons aka Ambazonia Governing Council
>
>
>
>
>
> =================================================
>
> A MESSAGE TO SOUTHERN CAMEROONS CITIZENS IN THE POLICE & MILITARY
>
> After having watched and heard what happened in Buea, Bamenda, Kumba and in
> the streets of other towns of Southern Cameroons, I ask you the following:
> 1) Were YOU also involved in the killing, maiming and raping of your own
> unarmed children and siblings?
> 2) If YOU were not, and saw it happening, what did you do? or what can you
> do about it?
> 3) Do you still believe in the commander in chief garbage, when asked by
> some dictatorial hierarchy to kill and maim unarmed citizens?
> 4) Do you remember that in life, there is crime of commission as well as
> crime of omission?
>
> 5) Do you know that currently, you are committing crimes of omission by even
> standing and watching while Yaounde slaughter children in Southern
> Cameroons?
>
> AGC
>
>
> Twitter: @AmbaGovCouncil<https://twitter.com/scnccouncil> or
> #AmbaGovCouncil<https://twitter.com/scnccouncil><https://twitter.com/scnccouncil><https://twitter.com/scnccouncil>
>
> Website: http://www.ambazoniagc.org/
>
> Passport Application Form: http://www.ambazoniagc.org/passport.php
>
>
>
> [1481709435832_Release]
>
> --
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
> "ambasbay" group.
> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an
> email to ambasbay+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com.
> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
>

--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "ambasbay" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to ambasbay+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.