Dear all,
To be frank to all of us, I will like any one of us to tell us why we have to join anybody at all. The UK informed the UN that we were ripe for independence. The UN voted overwhelmingly for our independence, If we would not be able to survive on our own, we would have been the ones to complain. We did not. Independence by joining, which is not even in the UN charter was devilishly conceived as pathway to our slavery. Now this has effectively played into our reasoning until we dare think of it as a possible option. The hope is that we will vote against it. But the mere mention of it implies its possibility. God forbid!!!
Ngwa Ntonufor
On Mon, Aug 7, 2017 at 8:50 PM, 'Timothy Mbeseha' via ambasbay <ambasbay@googlegroups.com> wrote:
--I am still to understand this whole idea of any referendum question. I think the majority of Southern Cameroonians stand for independence because the UN notion of Trusteeship was supposed to end with independence for the trust territory. That independence was denied us by the very UN that was supposed to guide us to that goal. Why should we be the people suggesting a referendum now? I think and strongly suggest that we should not be asking for any referendum. If there must be a referendum that suggestion should come from the UN not us. And finally if the UN suggest a referendum I think the question should be simple and straightforward thus: "Do you want to remain with La Republique du Cameroon or to separate?" Mbeseha
Sent from my iPhon--Dear Comrades,In each case, when the time came for it, each UN trust territory acceded to independence. What was, or is, so special about us that anybody should give thought to a federation with whoever. The Republic of Cameroon never sleeps as we seem to be doing. They are on several fronts and this federation option is one of them. They actually encourage the option, with the intention that at some point they will tell the world how they have accepted our request for a federation. Then if it happens, the final nail would have be done with on our coffin. Or does anyone doubt that such a federation will be based on their terms? I suggest that we do not even entertain things that do not concern us because, as I have said it often, they are intended to distract us and.to gradually make their options palatable to us. In any meeting between our representatives and those of the Republic of Cameroon, the Republic of Cameroon must be made to admit loud and clear they we are another country, equal in status to them.We are not part of their country. We have to be assertive.NNOn Mon, Aug 7, 2017 at 9:21 AM, Atemkeng Denis <denatem@yahoo.com> wrote:Dear All,I was listening to the Cameroon Journal message this morning and heard them propose that the referendum questions should be either independence or federation. I am writing to vigorously reject the proposal. There is absolutely no reason why we should deprive our people at any time in their future of absolute independence, if it does not happen now. Therefore for me, the proposed referendum questions (if it came to that) should be whether we want to achieve independence NOW or LATER. If the majority opt to achieve independence later (God forbid), then we continue in the illegal situation until such time that we are prepared to become independent. But there is absolutely no basis for a federation because we thereby reject all the protections that we have under international law. The facts of our case are so clear and strong that at no time should our people be deprived of the choice of independence. Putting a federation on the table means that we are rejecting all the arguments we are making today for freedom, because if you choose federation, you thereby bind yourselves forever. You will never again raise an argument to be free, because no one will listen to you! The strength of our argument today is that we never gave our consent and that we have only been illegally occupied. What happens to this argument when you choose a federation, which inevitably, must fail? Not one such federation has succeeded in Africa, despite the numerous attempts. Let us not deceive ourselves that the federation that failed in the past will succeed today: the mentalities have not changed, as all you can see that we are still being treated like captives and people defeated at war.We must not accept the idea of forcing another ill-fated federation on our people! Thankfully, the other side is not even granting those who are talking of federation that option. I have explained over and over that there is absolutely no one-Cameroon formula, federation or otherwise, that will solve the Southern Cameroons problem. Why? Because we are dealing simply with a game of numbers! You will be overwhelmed, inevitably, by their population! You will have no school, town or place you can call your own. Sasse, Saker, University of Buea and all the rest are already Francophone schools, through the one-cameroon formula. You will simply be inviting cultural genocide. Reflect and you will see this clearly also. No mistakes at this point!!!!Therefore the question must simply be whether we want to achieve independence NOW or Later, if the matter came to a referendum.Thank you.Atemnkeng.
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "ambasbay" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to ambasbay+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com .
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout .
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "ambasbay" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to ambasbay+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com .
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout .
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "ambasbay" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to ambasbay+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
0 comments:
Post a Comment