Re: SOUTHERN CAMEROONS: SUING LA REPUBLIQUE DU CAMEROUN AT THE INTERNATIONAL COURT OF JUSTICE (ICJ)

GREAT.
 
Blessed Be Cameroon
Pa Fru Ndeh



From: Martin Tumasang <tumasangm@hotmail.com>
To: "ambasbay@googlegroups.com" <ambasbay@googlegroups.com>
Sent: Friday, August 11, 2017 8:50 AM
Subject: SOUTHERN CAMEROONS: SUING LA REPUBLIQUE DU CAMEROUN AT THE INTERNATIONAL COURT OF JUSTICE (ICJ)

 
Dear All,
our greatest hope has always been to have an opportunity in an international forum such as the ICJ to sue La Republique du Cameroun, and ventilate all our anger for their various crimes including annexation, concolonisation, subjugation, spoliation, resources theft, human rights violations, etc., and invoking their state responsibility.

The only options open to us is to sue directly, which we tried by submitting an interpleader in the Bakassi case and it was rejected since we are not a state party to the Statute of the ICJ by not being a member of the UN, or to get a state that is a member of the UN to crystallize a dispute between itself and La Republique du Cameroun on the issue and then sue La Republique du Cameroun on our behalf.

So far Southern Cameroons has failed on the above possibilities hence I decided to try and see if legally there might exist another unexplored legal loophole to get us in. I researched various UN resolutions passed since the 1945 war to see if I can discover something that might help. I finally discovered a possible loophole which I called the Tumasang Worm Hole (TWH) that can get us into the ICJ and I announced it as explained below:

Unexplored Window of Opportunity to Take La Republique du Cameroun to the ICJ
Article 93, paragraph 2 of the Charter of the United Nations provides an exception where in some cases, a State not a Member of the United Nations may become a party to the Statute of the Court. Article 35, paragraph 2 of the Statute of the Court deals with States which are not parties to the Statute of the Court, as Members of the United Nations or otherwise. It provides that the Security Council can lay down the conditions under which the Court shall be open to such States and also provides a reservation for "special provisions contained in treaties in force". 

Security Council adopted resolution 9 (1946) of 15 October 1946, provides that the Court shall be open to any State not a party to the Statute which has previously deposited a declaration, either in respect of one or more particular matters or with a more general ambit, whereby the State undertakes to accept the jurisdiction of the Court in accordance with the Charter and to comply in good faith with the decisions of the Court. This provision clearly gives a window (albeit a small one) of opportunity for SCACUF on behalf of Ambazonia(Southern Cameroons) to deposit a declaration on in the ICJ accepting the jurisdiction of the ICJ, pledging to comply in good faith with the decisions of the court, then try to get access as a non state party that has become a party to the statute of the ICJ in accordance with Article 93, paragraph 2, and Article 35, paragraph 2 of the Statute of the Court, and as provided for by UN Resolution 9 (1946) of 15 October 1946.

This UN Resolution 9 (1946) of 15 October 1946 (which I called the Tumasang Worm Hole (TWH)) is an opportunity which we never knew existed and which we can explore and see how we can exploit it and seize the ICJ and get a hearing for our case against La Republique du Cameroun.

I sincerely believe the ICJ and La Republique du Cameroun have not heard the last of us.

Regards

Tumasang

--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "ambasbay" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to ambasbay+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.


0 comments:

Post a Comment

 
College & Education © 2012 | Designed by