Re: [MTC Global] Cross Road

There is no argument to the facts put forth by Prof Bhola Nath.
MTC G can also conduct surveys to prove it further & highlight the issues.
What is important is the owners of Management institutions & Education
founders need to understand this in all its entrirety. There is a
clear gap that exists betweek Faculty & Owners of institutions.
Faculty are not vociferous also in stating the facts & calling spade a
spade.
I feel, MTC must call for a meeting of all owners of Management
institution for a Panel discussion. It must be an exclusive affair &
even if 5% change, it is a huge leap for the Mgt education movement.
Faculty anyhow are for it & will always dupport.

Ramesh Vemuganti
29/9/12


On 9/28/12, bnath.dutta@gmail.com <bnath.dutta@gmail.com> wrote:
> Dear All,
> Greetinsgs !
> As my interaction goes with many faculty colleagues :
>
> 1. Many managements are not interested about faculty publication/research
> as it is linked with individual development and if one leaves , such
> resources also go out.
>
> There is no retention policy and it is asssumed that the faculty is going to
> leave shortly. This short-sightedness paralyse many good initiatives.
>
> 2. Management always look for contribution towards institutional development
> like -- how many subjects one handling, admin work, inspection, admission
> et. al.
>
> To effectively engage one hour class, minimum 3 hours preparation /research
> is required. One of my colleagues told me in IISc , Professor are given 6
> Hrs time for preparation before going for the class.
>
> Individal excellence collectively enable institutional excellence.
> Management,infrastructure and sound college processes can not ensure
> excellence and it provides just a framework.
>
> To my opinion, both are complementary to each other.
>
> Regards.....Bholanath
>
>
>
> Sent from my Nokia phone
>